Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Nov 25;20(1):181.
doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00879-z.

Trend analysis of palliative care consultation service for terminally ill non-cancer patients in Taiwan: a 9-year observational study

Lian-Shin Lin  1 , Ling-Hui Huang  1 , Yu-Chen Chang  2 , Chun-Li Wang  3   4 , Lung-Chun Lee  3 , Chung-Chieh Hu  3 , Pi-Shan Hsu  3 , Wei-Min Chu  5   6   7   8   9
Affiliations
Observational Study

Trend analysis of palliative care consultation service for terminally ill non-cancer patients in Taiwan: a 9-year observational study

Lian-Shin Lin et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Backgrounds: Early integration of palliative care for terminally ill non-cancer patients improves quality of life. However, there are scanty data on Palliative Care Consultation Service (PCCS) among non-cancer patients.

Methods: In this 9-year observational study Data were collected from the Hospice-Palliative Clinical Database (HPCD) of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TCVGH). Terminally ill non-cancer patients with 9 categories of diagnoses who received PCCS during 2011 to 2019 were enrolled. Trend analysis was performed to evaluate differences in categories of diagnosis throughout study period, duration of PCCS, patient outcomes, DNR declaration, awareness of disease by patients and families before and after PCCS.

Results: In total, 536 non-cancer patients received PCCS from 2011 to 2019 with an average age of 70.7 years. The average duration of PCCS was 18.4 days. The distributions of age, gender, patient outcomes, family's awareness of disease before PCCS, and patient's awareness of disease after PCCS were significantly different among the diagnoses. Organic brain disease and Chronic kidney disease (CKD) were the most prevalent diagnoses in patients receiving PCCS in 2019. For DNR declaration, the percentage of patients signing DNR before PCCS remained high throughout the study period (92.8% in 2019). Patient outcomes varied according to the disease diagnoses.

Conclusion: This 9-year observational study showed that the trend of PCCS among non-cancer patients had changed over the duration of the study. An increasing number of terminally ill non-cancer patients received PCCS during late life, thereby increasing the awareness of disease for both patients and families, which would tend to better prepare terminally ill patients for end-of-life as they may consider DNR consent. Early integration of PCCS into ordinary care for terminally non-cancer patients is essential for better quality of life.

Keywords: Awareness; Do-not-resuscitate; Non-cancer; Palliative care consultation service.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trend of terminally ill non-cancer patients receiving PCCS with different disease category from 2011 to 2019
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trend of DNR declaration of terminally ill non-cancer patients receiving PCCS from 2011 to 2019
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Trend of non-cancer patients’ and family’s awareness of disease before and after PCCS from 2011 to 2019
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Trend of difference of non-cancer patients’ and family’s awareness of disease before and after PCCS from 2011 to 2019
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, Lloyd-Sherlock P, Epping-Jordan JE, Peeters G, Mahanani WR, et al. The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet (London, England) 2016;387(10033):2145–2154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kontis V, Bennett JE, Mathers CD, Li G, Foreman K, Ezzati M. Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble. Lancet (London, England) 2017;389(10076):1323–1335. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32381-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Adair T, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet (London, England) 2012;380(9859):2095–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lastrucci V, D'Arienzo S, Collini F, Lorini C, Zuppiroli A, Forni S, Bonaccorsi G, Gemmi F, Vannucci A. Diagnosis-related differences in the quality of end-of-life care: a comparison between cancer and non-cancer patients. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204458. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander K, Goldberg J, Korc-Grodzicki B. Palliative care and symptom Management in Older Patients with Cancer. Clin Geriatr Med. 2016;32(1):45–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2015.08.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types