Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 25;12(1):6861.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26877-6.

Hydrothermal plumes as hotspots for deep-ocean heterotrophic microbial biomass production

Affiliations

Hydrothermal plumes as hotspots for deep-ocean heterotrophic microbial biomass production

Cécile Cathalot et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Carbon budgets of hydrothermal plumes result from the balance between carbon sinks through plume chemoautotrophic processes and carbon release via microbial respiration. However, the lack of comprehensive analysis of the metabolic processes and biomass production rates hinders an accurate estimate of their contribution to the deep ocean carbon cycle. Here, we use a biogeochemical model to estimate the autotrophic and heterotrophic production rates of microbial communities in hydrothermal plumes and validate it with in situ data. We show how substrate limitation might prevent net chemolithoautotrophic production in hydrothermal plumes. Elevated prokaryotic heterotrophic production rates (up to 0.9 gCm-2y-1) compared to the surrounding seawater could lead to 0.05 GtCy-1 of C-biomass produced through chemoorganotrophy within hydrothermal plumes, similar to the Particulate Organic Carbon (POC) export fluxes reported in the deep ocean. We conclude that hydrothermal plumes must be accounted for as significant deep sources of POC in ocean carbon budgets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Chemolithoautotrophic and chemoorganotrophic biomass production rates in hydrothermal non-buoyant plumes: model outputs and measurements.
a Chemolithoautotrophic biomass production rates from the CrabSpa vent field: comparison between NBP model outputs and fluid incubation data from ref. . b Distribution of the type of metabolisms responsible for the primary production at the CrabSpa vent field: comparison between NBP model outputs and fluid incubation data from ref. . c Chemoorganotrophic and chemolithautotrophic biomass production predicted for the El Hierro eruption based on data from ref. . d Distribution of the type of metabolisms responsible for the chemoorganotrophic and chemolithoautotrophic biomass production predicted for the El Hierro eruption based on data from ref. . e Chemoorganotrophic biomass production rates within the TAG vent non-buoyant plume: comparison between model outputs and data derived from 3H-Leucine incorporations (conventionally designed as prokaryotic heterotrophic production, PHP) rates on incubations performed during the BICOSE 2 cruise. Boxplots denote the median (center line) and interquartile range (box), with whiskers extending to three times the interquartile range and points indicating values outside this range.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Global prokaryotic biomass production through chemoorganotrophic processes within non-buoyant hydrothermal plumes.
a Chemoorganotrophic production rates as a function of heat flux for various hydrothermal sites from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR: Rainbow, Tour Eiffel, Broken Spur, TAG), the East-Pacific Rise - Grand Bonum site (EPR, GB), the Main Endeavor vent field (Dante), and the Central Indian Ridge (CIR: Kairei). b Global map of the chemoorganotrophic production rates within the non-buoyant plume for the following hydrothermal sites on the MAR (Rainbow, Tour Eiffel, Logatchev, Broken Spur, TAG, Ashadze), the EPR (Grand Bonum, EPR, GB), the Main Endeavor vent Field (Dante), and the CIR (Kairei, Edmonds).

References

    1. del Giorgio PA, Duarte CM. Respiration in the open ocean. Nature. 2002;420:379–384. - PubMed
    1. Burd AB, et al. Assessing the apparent imbalance between geochemical and biochemical indicators of meso- and bathypelagic biological activity: What the @$#! is wrong with present calculations of carbon budgets? Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Stud. Oceanogr. 2010;57:1557–1571.
    1. Hopkinson CS, Vallino JJ. Efficient export of carbon to the deep ocean through dissolved organic matter. Nature. 2005;433:142–145. - PubMed
    1. Lavery TJ, et al. Iron defecation by sperm whales stimulates carbon export in the Southern Ocean. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2010;277:3527–3531. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith KL, Ruhl HA, Huffard CL, Messié M, Kahru M. Episodic organic carbon fluxes from surface ocean to abyssal depths during long-term monitoring in NE Pacific. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:12235–12240. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types