Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug;23(6):979-991.
doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01414-w. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Costing methodologies in European economic evaluation guidelines: commonalities and divergences

Affiliations
Review

Costing methodologies in European economic evaluation guidelines: commonalities and divergences

Leticia García-Mochón et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

From both the methodological point of view and standardization of methodology, little attention has been paid to the estimation of direct costs in evaluation of healthcare technologies. The objective is to revise the recommendations on direct costs provided in European economic evaluation guidelines and to identify the commonalities and divergences among them. To achieve this, a comprehensive search through several online databases was performed resulting in 41 documents from 26 European countries, be they economic evaluation guidelines or costing guidelines. The results show a large disparity in methodologies used in estimation of direct costs to be included in economic evaluations of health technologies recommended by European countries. A lack of standardization of cost estimation methodologies influences arbitrariness in selecting costs of resources included in economic evaluations of medicinal products or any other technologies and, therefore, in decision making process necessary to introduce new technology. In addition, this heterogeneity poses a major challenge for identifying factors that could affect the variability of unit costs across countries.

Keywords: Costing methodology; Economic evaluation; Guidelines; Standardization of methodologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Drummond, M.F., Schwartz, J.S., Jönsson, B., Luce, B.R., Neumann, P.J., Siebert, U., Sullivan, S.D.: Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care. 24, 244–258 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462308080343 . (discussion 362–8) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G., O’Brien, J., Stoddart, G.L.: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
    1. Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A.H., Mauskopf, J.: Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. J. Med. Econ. (2013). https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2013.784591 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Špacírová, Z., Epstein, D., García-Mochón, L., Rovira, J., de Labry, O., Lima, A., Espín, J.: A general framework for classifying costing methods for economic evaluation of health care. Eur. J. Health Econ. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01157-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. EUnetHTA: Methods for health economic evaluations—A guideline based on current practices in Europe. https://www.eunethta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Methods_for_health_ec... (2015). Accessed 25 May 2020

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources