Costing methodologies in European economic evaluation guidelines: commonalities and divergences
- PMID: 34825296
- DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01414-w
Costing methodologies in European economic evaluation guidelines: commonalities and divergences
Abstract
From both the methodological point of view and standardization of methodology, little attention has been paid to the estimation of direct costs in evaluation of healthcare technologies. The objective is to revise the recommendations on direct costs provided in European economic evaluation guidelines and to identify the commonalities and divergences among them. To achieve this, a comprehensive search through several online databases was performed resulting in 41 documents from 26 European countries, be they economic evaluation guidelines or costing guidelines. The results show a large disparity in methodologies used in estimation of direct costs to be included in economic evaluations of health technologies recommended by European countries. A lack of standardization of cost estimation methodologies influences arbitrariness in selecting costs of resources included in economic evaluations of medicinal products or any other technologies and, therefore, in decision making process necessary to introduce new technology. In addition, this heterogeneity poses a major challenge for identifying factors that could affect the variability of unit costs across countries.
Keywords: Costing methodology; Economic evaluation; Guidelines; Standardization of methodologies.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Spanish recommendations on economic evaluation of health technologies.Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Oct;11(5):513-20. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0244-4. Epub 2010 Apr 20. Eur J Health Econ. 2010. PMID: 20405159
-
Are costs derived from diagnosis-related groups suitable for use in economic evaluations? A comparison across nine European countries in the European Healthcare and Social Cost Database.Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;23(9):1563-1575. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01444-y. Epub 2022 Feb 26. Eur J Health Econ. 2022. PMID: 35217963
-
[A proposed guideline for economic evaluation of health technologies].Gac Sanit. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(2):154-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Dec 2. Gac Sanit. 2010. PMID: 19959258 Spanish.
-
Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):336-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x. Value Health. 2007. PMID: 17888098
-
Is There a European View on Health Economic Evaluations? Results from a Synopsis of Methodological Guidelines Used in the EUnetHTA Partner Countries.Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jan;34(1):59-76. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0328-1. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016. PMID: 26446858 Review.
Cited by
-
Validation of the PECUNIA reference unit costs templates in Spain: a useful tool for multi-national economic evaluations of health technologies.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00601-9. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024. PMID: 39696415 Free PMC article.
-
The Development of a New Approach for the Harmonized Multi-Sectoral and Multi-Country Cost Valuation of Services: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Cost (RUC) Templates.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Nov;22(6):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00905-0. Epub 2024 Aug 8. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024. PMID: 39115752 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Drummond, M.F., Schwartz, J.S., Jönsson, B., Luce, B.R., Neumann, P.J., Siebert, U., Sullivan, S.D.: Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care. 24, 244–258 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462308080343 . (discussion 362–8) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G., O’Brien, J., Stoddart, G.L.: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
-
- Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A.H., Mauskopf, J.: Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. J. Med. Econ. (2013). https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2013.784591 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Špacírová, Z., Epstein, D., García-Mochón, L., Rovira, J., de Labry, O., Lima, A., Espín, J.: A general framework for classifying costing methods for economic evaluation of health care. Eur. J. Health Econ. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01157-9 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- EUnetHTA: Methods for health economic evaluations—A guideline based on current practices in Europe. https://www.eunethta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Methods_for_health_ec... (2015). Accessed 25 May 2020
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources