Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec;32(4):855-876.
doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09528-x. Epub 2021 Nov 26.

Cognitive Intra-individual Variability in HIV: an Integrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Cognitive Intra-individual Variability in HIV: an Integrative Review

David E Vance et al. Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Nearly 30-50% of people living with HIV experience HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND). HAND indicates performance at least one standard deviation below the normative mean on any two cognitive domains. This method for diagnosing or classifying cognitive impairment has utility, however, cognitive intraindividual variability provides a different way to understand cognitive impairment. Cognitive intraindividual variability refers to the scatter in cognitive performance within repeated measures of the same cognitive test (i.e., inconsistency) or across different cognitive tests (i.e., dispersion). Cognitive intraindividual variability is associated with cognitive impairment and cognitive decline in various clinical populations. This integrative review of 13 articles examined two types of cognitive intraindividual variability in people living with HIV, inconsistency and dispersion. Cognitive intraindividual variability appears to be a promising approach to detect subtle cognitive impairments that are not captured by traditional mean-based neuropsychological testing. Greater intraindividual variability in people living with HIV has been associated with: 1) poorer cognitive performance and cognitive decline, 2) cortical atrophy, both gray and white matter volume, 3) poorer everyday functioning (i.e., driving simulation performance), specifically medication adherence, and 4) even mortality. This inspires future directions for research. First, greater cognitive intraindividual variability may reflect a greater task demand on executive control to harness and regulate cognitive control over time. By improving executive functioning through cognitive training, it may reduce cognitive intraindividual variability which could slow down cognitive decline. Second, cognitive intraindividual variability may be reconsidered in prior cognitive intervention studies in which only mean-based cognitive outcomes were used. It is possible that such cognitive interventions may actually improve cognitive intraindividual variability, which could have clinical relevance.

Keywords: Cognition; Dispersion; Executive dysfunction; HIV/AIDS; Inconsistency; Intra-individual variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

The authors report no real or perceived vested interest that relate to this article that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Diagram Demonstrating Screening Method for Literature Search (Adapted from Moher et al., 2009)

References

    1. Abdi H (2010). Coefficient of variation. In Salkind NJ (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 169–171). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. 10.4135/9781412961288.n56 - DOI
    1. Alakkas A, Ellis RJ, Watson CW, Umlauf A, Heaton RK, Letendre S, Collier A, Marra C, Clifford DB, Gelman B, Sacktor N, Morgello S, Simpson D, McCutchan JA, Kallianpur A, Gianella S, Marcotte T, Grant I, Fennema-Notestine C, & CHARTER Group (2019). White matter damage, neuroinflammation, and neuronal integrity in HAND. Journal of Neurovirology, 25(1), 32–41. 10.1007/s13365-018-0682-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson AE, Jones JD, Thaler NS, Kuhn TP, Singer EJ, & Hinkin CH (2018). Intraindividual variability in neuropsychological performance predicts cognitive decline and death in HIV. Neuropsychology, 32(8), 966–972. 10.1037/neu0000482 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker JT, Brew BJ, Byrid DA, Cherner M, Clifford DB, Cinque P, Epstein LG, Goodkin K, Gisslen M, Grant I, Heaton RK, Joseph J, Marker K, Marra CM, McArthur M, Nunn M, Price RW, . . . Wojna VE (2007). Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology, 69, 1789–1799. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000287431.88658.8b - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arce Rentería M, Byrd D, Coulehan K, Miranda C, Fuentes A, Rosario AK, Morris EP, & Rivera Mindt M (2020). Neurocognitive intra-individual variability within HIV+ adults with and without current substance use. Neuropsychology, 14(3), 321–330. http://doi:10.1037/neu0000612 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms