Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec:93:222-233.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

Examining a new prosocial risk-taking scale in a longitudinal sample of ethnically diverse adolescents

Emma Armstrong-Carter  1 , Kathy T Do  2 , João F Guassi Moreira  3 , Mitchell J Prinstein  2 , Eva H Telzer  2
Affiliations

Examining a new prosocial risk-taking scale in a longitudinal sample of ethnically diverse adolescents

Emma Armstrong-Carter et al. J Adolesc. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: This longitudinal study designed and tested the validity of a new measure of prosocial risk taking - risks that individuals take in order to help others.

Methods: The sample was racially and ethnically diverse adolescents in the rural Southeastern United States (N = 867; Mage = 12.82 years, 10-14 years at Wave 1; 50% Girls, 33% White non-Latinx, 27% Latinx, 20% Black, 20% Mixed/Other race/ethnicity). Adolescents completed self-report measures of the new prosocial risk-taking scale at baseline and one- and two-year follow-ups.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated excellent model fit with a 6-item single factor score. Further, the scale demonstrated good test-retest reliability at one and two-year follow ups. The scale also demonstrated convergent validity, such that prosocial risk taking was positively correlated with prosocial tendencies, empathy, and sensation seeking, and negatively correlated with negative risk-taking behavior and risk tolerance. Finally, we found significant differences by race/ethnicity (but not by gender) in prosocial risk taking, which were not attributable to measurement invariance, and should be interpreted in the context of ongoing societal inequalities between youth.

Conclusions: The new Prosocial Risk-Taking Scale yielded reliable scores in our sample. It may be used in future research to investigate individual differences in adolescents' prosocial risk taking, developmental change in prosocial risk taking, and the significance of prosocial risk taking for adolescents' emotional and social adaptation.

Keywords: Adolescence; Measure validation; Prosocial risk taking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Data and syntax are available upon request.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Distribution of prosocial risk-taking factor scores at wave 1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Armstrong-Carter E, Bibby E, Burroughs M, Flannery J, Nelson B, Duell N, … Telzer EH (2021). The daily covariation between risk-taking and prosocial behaviors during adolescence: Individual differences by sensation seeking and social craving. Psycharxiv. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/B4H7E - DOI
    1. Armstrong-Carter E, Do KT, Duell N, Kwon SJ, Lindquist KA, Prinstein M, & Telzer EH (2021). Adolescents’ perceptions of social risk and prosocial tendencies: Developmental change and individual differences. Psycharxiv. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7M24D - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong-Carter E, & Telzer EH (2021). Understanding prosocial development in the context of systemic inequalities in the US and worldwide. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100040. doi: 10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100040 - DOI
    1. Benner AD, Wang Y, Shen Y, Boyle AE, Polk R, & Cheng Y-P (2018). Racial/ethnic discrimination and well-being during adolescence: A meta-analytic review. American Psychologist, 73(7), 855–883. doi: 10.1037/amp0000204 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blais AR, & Weber EU (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47.

Publication types