Investigation on the utilization of coal washery rejects by different microbial sources for biogenic methane production
- PMID: 34826901
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132165
Investigation on the utilization of coal washery rejects by different microbial sources for biogenic methane production
Abstract
High energy consumption and depletion of fossil fuels lead to the introduction of new technologies to produce alternative fuels with fewer emissions of greenhouse gases. The present investigation was focused to utilize the waste coal washery rejects as a substrate to produce biogenic methane under optimum conditions. Experiments were performed to explore the efficiency of non-coal samples (cow dung, distillery anaerobic digester sludge) and coal mines enriched samples in the degradation of coal washery rejects. Further cow dung, distillery anaerobic sludge, and coal washery rejects were taken at various concentrations to develop anaerobic slurry and analysed for its biogas production. The anaerobic slurry which contains 1:1:1 of cow dung, distillery anaerobic sludge, and coal washery rejects produced methane of around 55.7%. The coal enriched samples showed a maximum of 22.6% of methane. Subsequently, the best methane-producing anaerobic non-coal consortiums were compared with coal enriched microbial culture in converting coal washery rejects of 10 g/l to methane. Results revealed that cow dung inoculum and coal mine enriched inoculum source produced the nearly same amount of methane. This study suggested that the selected anaerobic slurries and coal enriched samples can utilize sub-bituminous coal washery rejects in methane production. Thus, these consortiums can be applied in converting a large amount of coal washery rejects into methane thus can lead to the reclamation of the site.
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Coal washery rejects; Methane (CH(4)); coal; methanogens.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
-
Fungal Solubilisation and Subsequent Microbial Methanation of Coal Processing Wastes.Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2021 Dec;193(12):3970-3982. doi: 10.1007/s12010-021-03681-y. Epub 2021 Sep 20. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 34542819
-
Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste.Waste Manag Res. 2016 Apr;34(4):307-15. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16628976. Epub 2016 Feb 15. Waste Manag Res. 2016. PMID: 26879909
-
Acid-fermented fish by-products broth: An influence to sludge reduction and biogas production in an anaerobic co-digestion.J Environ Manage. 2020 May 15;262:110305. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110305. Epub 2020 Feb 29. J Environ Manage. 2020. PMID: 32250789
-
Influence of pretreatment techniques on anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill sludge: A review.Bioresour Technol. 2017 Dec;245(Pt A):1206-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.179. Epub 2017 Sep 1. Bioresour Technol. 2017. PMID: 28893499 Review.
Cited by
-
Carbon dots as specific fluorescent sensors for Hg2+ and glutathione imaging.Mikrochim Acta. 2023 May 15;190(6):224. doi: 10.1007/s00604-023-05805-z. Mikrochim Acta. 2023. PMID: 37184606
-
Comparison of Biodegradation Mechanisms and Structural Evolution Characteristics between Anthracite and Bituminous Coals.ACS Omega. 2025 Jun 25;10(26):28269-28278. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c03151. eCollection 2025 Jul 8. ACS Omega. 2025. PMID: 40657121 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources