Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 22;10(11):1428.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111428.

Quantifying the Gap between Expected and Actual Rates of Antibiotic Prescribing in British Columbia, Canada

Affiliations

Quantifying the Gap between Expected and Actual Rates of Antibiotic Prescribing in British Columbia, Canada

Ariana Saatchi et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Despite decades of stewardship efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance and quantify changes in use, the quality of antibiotic use in British Columbia (BC) remains unknown. As the overuse and misuse of antibiotics drives antibiotic resistance, it is imperative to expand surveillance efforts to examine the quality of antibiotic prescriptions. In late 2019, Canadian expected rates of antibiotic prescribing were developed for common infections. These rates were utilized to quantify the gap between the observed rates of prescribing and Canadian expected rates for antibiotic use for the province of BC. The prescribing data were extracted and matched to physician billing systems using anonymized patient identifiers from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2018. Outpatient prescribing was further subdivided into community and emergency department settings and stratified by the following age groups: <2 years, 2-18 years, and ≥19 years. The proportions of physician visits that received antibiotic prescription were compared against the Canadian expected rates to quantify the unnecessary use for 18 common indications. Respiratory tract infections (RTI), including acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis, and acute pharyngitis, reported significant levels of overprescribing. Across all ages and health care settings, prescribing for RTI indications occurred at rates 2-8 times higher than the expected rates recommended by a group of expert Canadian physicians. Understanding the magnitude of unnecessary prescribing is a first step in delineating the provincial prescribing quality. The quantification of antibiotic overuse offers concrete targets for provincial stewardship efforts to reduce unnecessary prescribing by an average of 30% across both outpatient and emergency care settings.

Keywords: British Columbia; Canada; antibiotics; antimicrobial resistance (AMR); emergency care; epidemiology; outpatient care; prescription; respiratory tract infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of all antibiotics prescribed for common infections according to tier classification. Tier 1 = antibiotics always indicated (maximal rate 100%); tier 2a = antibiotics frequently indicated (maximal rate: 51–99%); tier 2b = antibiotics sometimes indicated (maximal rate: 21–50%); tier 2c = antibiotics rarely indicated (maximal rate: 1–20%); tier 3 = antibiotics never indicated (maximal rate: 0%).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall percent unnecessary antibiotic use for common conditions, by age. Only those tier2a,2b,2c, 3 conditions prescribed at rates above the Canadian maximal were included in our classification of unnecessary prescribing. Tier 1 indications were restricted within analyses to an unnecessary prescribing rate of 0%.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percent unnecessary antibiotic use for common conditions, by age and healthcare setting.

References

    1. Fleming-Dutra K.E., Hersh A.L., Shapiro D.J., Bartoces M., Enns E.A., File T.M., Finkelstein J.A., Gerber J.S., Hyun D.Y., Linder J.A., et al. Prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions among US ambulatory care visits, 2010–2011. JAMA. 2016;315:1864–1873. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4151. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dolk F.C.K., Pouwels K.B., Smith D.R.M., Robotham J.V., Smieszek T. Antibiotics in primary care in England: Which antibiotics are prescribed and for which conditions? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:ii2–ii10. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx504. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies S.C. Reducing inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics in English primary care: Evidence and outlook. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:833–834. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx535. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith D.R.M., Dolk F.C.K., Pouwels K.B., Christie M., Robotham J.V., Smieszek T. Defining the appropriateness and inappropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary care. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:ii11–ii18. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx503. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pouwels K.B., Dolk F.C.K., Pouwels K.B., Christie M., Robotham J.V., Smieszek T. Actual versus ‘ideal’ antibiotic prescribing for common conditions in English primary care. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:19–26. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx502. - DOI - PMC - PubMed