Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):1519.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111519.

Digital Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis

Affiliations
Review

Digital Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis

Anja Dillenseger et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

For incurable diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), the prevention of progression and the preservation of quality of life play a crucial role over the entire therapy period. In MS, patients tend to become ill at a younger age and are so variable in terms of their disease course that there is no standard therapy. Therefore, it is necessary to enable a therapy that is as personalized as possible and to respond promptly to any changes, whether with noticeable symptoms or symptomless. Here, measurable parameters of biological processes can be used, which provide good information with regard to prognostic and diagnostic aspects, disease activity and response to therapy, so-called biomarkers Increasing digitalization and the availability of easy-to-use devices and technology also enable healthcare professionals to use a new class of digital biomarkers-digital health technologies-to explain, influence and/or predict health-related outcomes. The technology and devices from which these digital biomarkers stem are quite broad, and range from wearables that collect patients' activity during digitalized functional tests (e.g., the Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test, dual-tasking performance and speech) to digitalized diagnostic procedures (e.g., optical coherence tomography) and software-supported magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. These technologies offer a timesaving way to collect valuable data on a regular basis over a long period of time, not only once or twice a year during patients' routine visit at the clinic. Therefore, they lead to real-life data acquisition, closer patient monitoring and thus a patient dataset useful for precision medicine. Despite the great benefit of such increasing digitalization, for now, the path to implementing digital biomarkers is widely unknown or inconsistent. Challenges around validation, infrastructure, evidence generation, consistent data collection and analysis still persist. In this narrative review, we explore existing and future opportunities to capture clinical digital biomarkers in the care of people with MS, which may lead to a digital twin of the patient. To do this, we searched published papers for existing opportunities to capture clinical digital biomarkers for different functional systems in the context of MS, and also gathered perspectives on digital biomarkers under development or already existing as a research approach.

Keywords: big data; digital biomarkers; digital health technology; digital twin; eHealth; multiple sclerosis; personalized therapy; precision medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

T.Z. received personal compensation from Biogen, Bayer, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva for consulting services, and additional financial support for research activities from Bayer, BAT, Biogen, Novartis, Teva and Sanofi. K.A. received personal compensation from Novartis, Biogen Idec, Sanofi, Alexion, Celgene and Roche for consulting services and speaker honoraria. R.H. received travel grants by Celgene and Sanofi. A.D. received personal compensation and travel grants from Biogen, Celegene, Roche and Sanofi for speaker activity. M.L.W. received travel grants from Biogen. M.S. received travel grants from TEVA.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Developing a digital clinical assessment. (EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; and MSPT: Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test). © Multiple Scle-rosis Center Dresden.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of the psychological refractory period paradigm as a dual-task assessment in MS. Stimulus 1 (tone) is always presented first, followed by stimulus 2 (letter) in a defined stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA). PwMS are advised to respond first to stimulus 1 and as quickly as possible to stimulus 2 by pressing defined keys. RT: reaction time [147].

References

    1. Ziemssen T., Kern R., Thomas K. Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Profiling and Data Collection as Prerequisite for Personal-ized Medicine Approach. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:124. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0639-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ziemssen T. Multiple sclerosis beyond EDSS: Depression and fatigue. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009;277:S37–S41. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(09)70011-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kourtis L., Regele O.B., Wright J.M., Jones G.B. Digital biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: The mobile/wearable devices opportunity. NPJ Digit. Med. 2019;2:9. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0084-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gold M., Amatniek J., Carrillo M.C., Cedarbaum J.M., Hendrix J.A., Miller B.B., Robillard J., Rice J.J., Soares H., Tome M.B., et al. Digital technologies as biomarkers, clinical outcomes assessment, and recruitment tools in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Alzheimer’s Dement. Transl. Res. Clin. Interv. 2018;4:234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.04.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rykov Y., Thach T.-Q., Bojic I., Christopoulos G., Car J. Digital Biomarkers for Depression Screening With Wearable Devices: Cross-sectional Study With Machine Learning Modeling. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2021;9:e24872. doi: 10.2196/24872. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources