Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 23;11(11):3040.
doi: 10.3390/ani11113040.

The Economics of Rabbit Farming: A Pilot Study on the Impact of Different Housing Systems

Chiara Mondin  1 , Samuele Trestini  1 , Angela Trocino  2 , Guido Di Martino  3
Affiliations

The Economics of Rabbit Farming: A Pilot Study on the Impact of Different Housing Systems

Chiara Mondin et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

This research evaluates the economic sustainability of rabbit farms using different housing systems-bicellular (BI), conventional dual-purpose (DP) and enriched cages designed according to the World Rabbit Science Association guidelines (WRSA)-through a field-based study involving six farms over the course of five years. The cages were compared based on three productivity indices expressed in kg of produced live weight/m2 and on eight cost indices expressed in EUR/kg of produced live weight. The results showed that WRSA significantly reduced the productivity index per walkable cage area in buildings and cages, thanks to the longer platform area included in the cage compared to the other systems. Concerning cost indexes, total variable costs were not different among housing systems, whereas significant differences were observed within costs items. As for the feed costs, DP underperforms compared to BI or WRSA (1.15 vs. 1.02 and 0.99 EUR/kg produced live weight); for drugs costs, BI was less competitive compared to DP and WRSA (0.12 vs. 0.06 and 0.05 EUR /kg). In conclusion, under the conditions of the present study, the economic results of farms that adopted housing systems designed to improve rabbit welfare, such as WRSA enriched systems, were economically sustainable and, comparable to conventional housing systems based on BI or DP cages, also provided a significant reduction in drug use in the tested farms. A comprehensive collection of data from more farms at a European level would be necessary to confirm these results on the economics of farms adopting alternative housing systems for rabbits.

Keywords: animal welfare; bicellular cage; dual purpose cage; enriched cage; production costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Council Directive 98/58/EC Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. [(accessed on 22 October 2021)];Off. J. Eur. Communities. 1998 :23–27. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5b04f403-0abf-4....
    1. Trocino A., Cotozzolo E., Zomeño C., Petracci M., Xiccato G., Castellini C. Rabbit production and science: The world and Italian scenarios from 1998 to 2018. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019;18:1361–1371. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2019.1662739. - DOI
    1. Trocino A., Xiccato G. Animal welfare in reared rabbits: A review with emphasis on housing system. World Rabbit. Sci. 2006;14:77–93. doi: 10.4995/wrs.2006.553. - DOI
    1. Macchi E., Prola L., Lazzarato V., Cornale P., Renna M., Perona G., Mimosi A. Il benessere dei conigli da allevamento e l’efficienza aziendale. Agricoltura. 2011;73:34–37.
    1. Trocino A., Filiou E., Tazzoli M., Bertotto D., Negrato E., Xiccato G. Behaviour and welfare of growing rabbits housed in cages and pens. Livest. Sci. 2014;167:305–314. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.035. - DOI