Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 25;11(11):3048.
doi: 10.3390/ani11113048.

A Systematic Review of the Use of Technology to Monitor Welfare in Zoo Animals: Is There Space for Improvement?

Affiliations
Review

A Systematic Review of the Use of Technology to Monitor Welfare in Zoo Animals: Is There Space for Improvement?

Alessia Diana et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

A top priority of modern zoos is to ensure good animal welfare (AW), thus, efforts towards improving AW monitoring are increasing. Welfare assessments are performed through more traditional approaches by employing direct observations and time-consuming data collection that require trained specialists. These limitations may be overcome through automated monitoring using wearable or remotely placed sensors. However, in this fast-developing field, the level of automated AW monitoring used in zoos is unclear. Hence, the aim of this systematic literature review was to investigate research conducted on the use of technology for AW assessment in zoos with a focus on real-time automated monitoring systems. The search led to 19 publications with 18 of them published in the last six years. Studies focused on mammals (89.5%) with elephant as the most studied species followed by primates. The most used technologies were camera (52.6%) and wearable sensors (31.6%) mainly used to measure behaviour, while the use of algorithms was reported in two publications only. This research area is still young in zoos and mainly focused on large mammals. Despite an increase in publications employing automated AW monitoring in the last years, the potential for this to become an extra useful tool needs further research.

Keywords: aquaria; automated monitoring; behaviour; camera; wildlife; zoological park.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Number of publications by year of publication; (B) country of the study and country of the first author’s affiliation. Publications can have more than one country for the first author.

References

    1. European Association of Zoos and Acquaria (EAZA) The Modern Zoo: Foundations for Management and Development. EAZA Executive Office; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2013. [(accessed on 20 July 2021)]. p. 104. Available online: https://www.eaza.net/assets/Uploads/images/Membership-docs-and-images/Zo....
    1. World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA); Mellor D.J., Hunt S., Gusset M., editors. Caring for Wildlife: The World Zoo and Aquarium Animal Welfare Strategy. WAZA Executive Office; Gland, Switzerland: 2015. [(accessed on 20 July 2021)]. p. 87. Available online: https://www.waza.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/WAZA-Animal-Welfare-Stra....
    1. Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) Animal Welfare Committee’s Mission Statement. 2015. [(accessed on 20 July 2021)]. Available online: https://www.aza.org/animal_welfare_committee.
    1. Hill S.P., Broom D.M. Measuring zoo animal welfare: Theory and practice. Zoo Biol. 2009;28:531–544. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20276. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whitham J.C., Wielebnowski N. New directions for zoo animal welfare science. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2013;147:247–260. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.004. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources