Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):3138.
doi: 10.3390/ani11113138.

Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats

Affiliations
Review

Animal-Based Indicators for On-Farm Welfare Assessment in Goats

Adrian Minnig et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

This review describes the current state of knowledge relating to scientific literature on welfare indicators for goats. Our aim was to provide an overview of animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessments. We performed a literature search and extracted 96 relevant articles by title, abstract, and full-text screening. Out of these articles, similar indicators were aggregated to result in a total of 32 welfare indicators, some of which were covered in multiple articles, others in only a single one. We discuss a set of three established assessment protocols containing these indicators, as well as all individual indicators which were covered in more than one article. As single indicators, we identified lameness, body condition score (BCS), qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA), and human-animal relationship (HAR) tests with substantial evidence for sufficient validity to assess welfare in goats. A multitude of indicators (e.g., hair coat condition) was studied less intensively but was successfully used for welfare assessments. For some indicators (e.g., oblivion, lying behaviour), we highlight the need for future research to further validate them or to optimise their use in on-farm welfare assessments. Moreover, further investigations need to include kids, bucks, and meat and fibre goats, as well as extensively kept goats as the literature predominantly focuses on dairy goats in intensive production systems.

Keywords: animal-based; goat; on-farm; small ruminant; welfare assessment; welfare indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Broom D.M. A History of Animal Welfare Science. Acta Biotheor. 2011;59:121–137. doi: 10.1007/s10441-011-9123-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Battini M., Vieira A., Barbieri S., Ajuda I., Stilwell G., Mattiello S. Invited Review: Animal-Based Indicators for on-Farm Welfare Assessment for Dairy Goats. J. Dairy Sci. 2014;97:6625–6648. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7493. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caroprese M., Casamassima D., Rassu S.P.G., Napolitano F., Sevi A. Monitoring the On-Farm Welfare of Sheep and Goats. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;8:343–354. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.343. - DOI
    1. Meagher R.K. Observer Ratings: Validity and Value as a Tool for Animal Welfare Research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;119:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.026. - DOI
    1. Anzuino K., Bell N.J., Bazeley K.J., Nicol C.J. Assessment of Welfare on 24 Commercial UK Dairy Goat Farms Based on Direct Observations. Vet. Rec. 2010;167:774–780. doi: 10.1136/vr.c5892. - DOI - PubMed