Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):3218.
doi: 10.3390/ani11113218.

Comparison of Ruminal Degradability, Indigestible Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Total-Tract Digestibility of Three Main Crop Straws with Alfalfa Hay and Corn Silage

Affiliations

Comparison of Ruminal Degradability, Indigestible Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Total-Tract Digestibility of Three Main Crop Straws with Alfalfa Hay and Corn Silage

Erdan Wang et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Three main crop straws including corn straw (Zea mays, CS), rice straw (Oryza sativa, RS), and wheat straw (Triticum aestivum, WS), and two forages including alfalfa hay (Medicago sativa, AH) and corn silage (Zea mays, CSil) were analyzed in order to compare their ruminal degradability, indigestible neutral detergent fiber (iNDF), intestinal digestibility (ID), and their total-tract digestibility (TTD) of crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) using both an in situ nylon bag technique and a mobile nylon bag technique. The forage samples were incubated in the rumen for 6, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 288 h, respectively, to determine their ruminal degradability. Prior to intestinal incubation, forage samples were incubated in the rumen for 12 h and 24 h to determine the ruminal degradable content of CP, NDF, and ADF, respectively, and for 288 h to determine their iNDF288 content. Residues from the ruminal undegradable fractions (12 h for CP, 24 h for NDF and ADF) were subsequently inserted into the duodenum through a cannula to determine their intestinal digestible content. Here, the TTD of CP, NDF, and ADF were determined as the ruminal degradable content + intestinal digestible content. The results showed that AH had the highest iNDF2.4 (calculated as acid detergent lignin content × 2.4) and iNDF288 values (379.42 and 473.40 g/kg of NDF), while CS and CSil had the lowest iNDF2.4 values (177.44 and 179.43 g/kg of NDF). The ruminal degradability of CP, NDF, and ADF for CS, RS, and WS were lower than those of AH and Csil during the first 48 h of incubation. The potential degradation fraction of CP, NDF, and ADF for CSil was the highest; CS, RS, and WS were intermediate; and AH was the lowest (p < 0.05). CS, RS, and WS had a lower intestinal digestibility with respect to their rumen undegradable content of NDF (p < 0.05), and lower TTD of CP, NDF, and ADF (p < 0.05) compared to AH and CSil. General regression equations with satisfactory accuracy (R2 ≥ 0.828) were derived to predict iNDF288 and TTD based on their chemical compositions and the ruminal degradation kinetics of different forages. Incorporating this information into rations could improve our ability to optimize main crop straws utilization and milk production.

Keywords: indigestible neutral detergent fiber; main crop straws; ruminal degradability; total-tract digestibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The real-time degradability of various forages during 288 h in situ incubation. (A) CP, (B) NDF, and (C) ADF. Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation. p-values of Forage Type, Time, and Forage Type × Time mean the effect of forage types, the effect of incubation times, and the interaction effect of forage types and incubation times. Data were fitted to a one-phase association exponential model with three parameters: y = a + b × [1 − exp (−c × t)], where y is the ruminal degradation of CP, NDF, and ADF at time t, a is the soluble or rapidly degradable fraction (g/kg); b is the potentially degradable fraction (g/kg); c is the constant rate of degradation of b (%/h); t is the time of incubation (h). Regression, p < 0.05; R2 for CS, RS, WS, AH, and CSil = 0.93 to 0.99, as shown in the graph. CS, corn straw; RS, rice straw; WS, wheat straw; AH, alfalfa hay; Csil, corn silage; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber. Each forage was incubated in 6 replicates (two for each time point per cow) in the rumen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ruminal degradable content, intestinal digestible content, and total-tract undigested content of CP, and NDF, and ADF in different forages. (A) CP, (B) NDF, and (C) ADF. RD, ruminal degradable content was determined after ruminal incubation for 12 h (CP) and 24 h (NDF and ADF); ID, intestinal digestible content; TTUD, total-tract undigested content. CS, corn straw; RS, rice straw; WS, wheat straw; AH, alfalfa hay; Csil, corn silage; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber. Each forage was incubated in 6 replicates (two for each time point per cow) in the rumen and 12 replicates for intestinal incubation.

References

    1. Statista, Worldwide Production of Grain in 2020/21, by Type. [(accessed on 10 August 2021)]. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263977/world-grain-production-by-type/
    1. Li H., Cao Y., Wang X., Ge X., Li B., Jin C. Evaluation on the Production of Food Crop Straw in China from 2006 to 2014. Bioenerg. Res. 2017;10:949–957. doi: 10.1007/s12155-017-9845-4. - DOI
    1. Ren J., Yu P., Xu X. Straw Utilization in China-Status and Recommendations. Sustainability. 2019;11:1762. doi: 10.3390/su11061762. - DOI
    1. Li J., Wei L., Duan Q., Hu G., Zhang G. Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure with Three Crop Residues for Biogas Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2014;156:307–313. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.064. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Y., Bi Y., Gao C. The Assessment and Utilization of Straw Resources in China. Agric. Sci. China. 2010;9:1807–1815. doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60279-0. - DOI