Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 26;12(11):1704.
doi: 10.3390/genes12111704.

Epigenetic Mechanisms of ART-Related Imprinting Disorders: Lessons From iPSC and Mouse Models

Affiliations
Review

Epigenetic Mechanisms of ART-Related Imprinting Disorders: Lessons From iPSC and Mouse Models

Alex Horánszky et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

The rising frequency of ART-conceived births is accompanied by the need for an improved understanding of the implications of ART on gametes and embryos. Increasing evidence from mouse models and human epidemiological data suggests that ART procedures may play a role in the pathophysiology of certain imprinting disorders (IDs), including Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, Silver-Russell syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, and Angelman syndrome. The underlying molecular basis of this association, however, requires further elucidation. In this review, we discuss the epigenetic and imprinting alterations of in vivo mouse models and human iPSC models of ART. Mouse models have demonstrated aberrant regulation of imprinted genes involved with ART-related IDs. In the past decade, iPSC technology has provided a platform for patient-specific cellular models of culture-associated perturbed imprinting. However, despite ongoing efforts, a deeper understanding of the susceptibility of iPSCs to epigenetic perturbation is required if they are to be reliably used for modelling ART-associated IDs. Comparing the patterns of susceptibility of imprinted genes in mouse models and IPSCs in culture improves the current understanding of the underlying mechanisms of ART-linked IDs with implications for our understanding of the influence of environmental factors such as culture and hormone treatments on epigenetically important regions of the genome such as imprints.

Keywords: DNA methylation; assisted reproductive technology; genomic imprinting; iPSCs; imprinting disorders; mouse models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.H., M.Z. and A.D. are employed by BioTalentum Ltd. and all authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Ferguson-Smith A.C. Genomic imprinting: The emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011;12:565–575. doi: 10.1038/nrg3032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartolomei M.S., Ferguson-Smith A. Mammalian Genomic Imprinting. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011;3:a002592. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a002592. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tucci V., Isles A., Kelsey G., Ferguson-Smith A.C., The Erice Imprinting Group Genomic Imprinting and Physiological Processes in Mammals. Cell. 2019;176:952–965. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies J.R., Dent C.L., McNamara I.G., Isles A.R. Behavioural effects of imprinted genes. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2015;2:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.07.008. - DOI
    1. Wilkinson L.S., Davies W., Isles A.R. Genomic imprinting effects on brain development and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;8:832–843. doi: 10.1038/nrn2235. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types