Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):2026.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112026.

AUditive Direct in Utero Observation (AUDIO): A Randomized Controlled Trial for a Prenatal Demonstration of Fetal Hearing

Affiliations

AUditive Direct in Utero Observation (AUDIO): A Randomized Controlled Trial for a Prenatal Demonstration of Fetal Hearing

Laura Larcher et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this randomized controlled study was to demonstrate whether acoustic stimulation in utero is associated with fetal reactivity which is documentable by cardiotocography.

Materials and methods: A monocentric randomized controlled trial was performed at a single university tertiary hospital between September 2016 and July 2017. This study was registered as a randomized clinical trial on clinicaltrail.gov (registration number NCT04622059). Unselected pregnancies at term of gestation were consecutively recruited for the purpose of this study. After 10 min of normal cardiotocography without accelerations (non-stress-test with a basal frequency between 110 and 150 beats/min, normal variability between 6 and 15 b/min, no accelerations, and no fetal movements), fetuses were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either of the two groups. Fetuses in group A (n = 105) received acoustic stimulation after 10 min from the beginning of the CTG, whereas fetuses in group B received no stimulation (n = 105). The outcome variables investigated were the lapse of time between the beginning of the CTG and the occurrence of the first acceleration, and the lapse of time between the beginning of the CTG and the first fetal movement noticed.

Results: The lapse of time between the beginning of the CTG and the occurrence of the first acceleration was significantly shorter in the group with acoustic stimulation compared to the other group (14.87 ± 5.01 vs. 21.90 ± 6.94 min, p-value < 0.001 log-rank test). Similarly, the lapse of time between the beginning of the CTG and the occurrence of the first fetal movement was significantly shorter in group A compared to group B (17.77 ± 7.62 vs. 23.28 ± 7.61 min, p-value < 0.001, log-rank test). Fetal cardiac acceleration and the occurrence of a fetal movement during the first 20 min of the CTG were more frequently recorded in group A compared to group B (respectively, 15% vs. 5% and 20% vs. 8%).

Conclusion: This RCT showed an early fetal reaction following auditive stimulus, documentable by cardiotocography. Further research is needed to investigate a possible role of acoustic stimulation in utero for the prenatal diagnosis of congenital hypoacusis.

Keywords: CTG; RCT; auditive stimulus; congenital hypoacusis; fetuses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hearing stimulation procedure in group A: An auditive stimulus was generated in group A. This stimulus was produced by hitting a diapason on an acoustic surface, at a distance of 2–3 cm from the mother’s skin (in order to prevent mechanical vibration reaching the fetus) in the area near the fetus’s head. The same procedure was repeated three times, with 30 s between each stimulus and the following one. The total duration of stimulation was approximately 2 min.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CTG demonstration of fetal reaction: after 10 min of normal cardiotocography without accelerations, fetuses randomized in group A received acoustic stimulation (X). The outcome variables investigated were the lapse of time between the beginning of the CTG and the occurrence of the first acceleration, and the lapse of time between the beginning of the CTG and the first fetal movement noticed (|).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cox regression plot of elapsed time with normal cardiotocography without accelerations in group A cases (solid line) and in group B controls (dotted line).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cox regression plot of elapsed time with no perception of fetal movements in group A cases (solid line) and in group B controls (dotted line).

References

    1. Consort—Welcome to the CONSORT Website. [(accessed on 24 October 2021)]. Available online: http://www.consort-statement.org/
    1. Serafini P., Lindsay M.B., Nagey D.A., Pupkin M.J., Tseng P., Crenshaw C. Antepartum Fetal Heart Rate Response to Sound Stimulation: The Acoustic Stimulation Test. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1984;148:41–45. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(84)80029-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trudinger B.J., Boylan P. Antepartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Value of Sound Stimulation. Obstet. Gynecol. 1980;55:265–268. - PubMed
    1. Nyman M., Arulkumaran S., Jakobsson J., Westgren M. Vibro-Acoustic Stimulation in High-Risk Pregnancies; Maternal Perception of Fetal Movements, Fetal Heart Rate and Fetal Outcome. J. Perinat. Med. 1992;20:267–274. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1992.20.4.267. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inglis S.R., Druzin M.L., Wagner W.E., Kogut E. The Use of Vibroacoustic Stimulation during the Abnormal or Equivocal Biophysical Profile. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993;82:371–374. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources