A Nomogram for Predicting Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery during the Endoscopic Resection of Subepithelial Tumors of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
- PMID: 34829507
- PMCID: PMC8624280
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112160
A Nomogram for Predicting Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery during the Endoscopic Resection of Subepithelial Tumors of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
Abstract
Background: Considering the widespread use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial tumors (SET) increases. For relatively safer removal of upper GI SETs, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed as an alternative to surgery. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of endoscopic resection for SETs and develop a prediction model for the need for laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) during the procedure.
Method: We retrospectively analyzed 123 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for upper GI SETs between January 2012 and December 2020 at our institution. Intraoperatively, they underwent ESD or submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER).
Results: ESD and STER were performed in 107 and 16 patients, respectively. The median age was 55 years, and the average tumor size was 1.5 cm. En bloc resection was achieved in 114 patients (92.7%). The median follow-up duration was 242 days without recurrence. Perforation occurred in 47 patients (38.2%), and 30 patients (24.4%) underwent LECS. Most perforations occurred in the fundus. Through multivariable analysis, we built a nomogram that can predict LECS requirement according to tumor location, size, patient age, and sex. The prediction model exhibited good discrimination ability, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893.
Conclusions: Endoscopic resection is a noninvasive procedure for small upper-GI SETs. Most perforations can be successfully managed endoscopically. The prediction model for LECS requirement is useful in treatment planning.
Keywords: GIST; endoscopic resection; laparoscopy; subepithelial tumor.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study.GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 6;30(2):115-120. doi: 10.1159/000525993. eCollection 2023 Mar. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 37008525 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection in upper gastrointestinal sub-epithelial tumors.Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;38(6):509-517. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-00988-x. Epub 2020 Jan 30. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 32002832
-
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric fundus subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria.Exp Ther Med. 2013 Aug;6(2):391-395. doi: 10.3892/etm.2013.1181. Epub 2013 Jun 25. Exp Ther Med. 2013. PMID: 24137195 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in endoscopic resection: a review of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER).Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Apr 25;7:19. doi: 10.21037/tgh-2020-10. eCollection 2022. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 35548477 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for the upper gastrointestinal tract.Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May 5;2:40. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.03.20. eCollection 2017. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28616596 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Nomogram to predict gas-related complications during transoral endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: Clinical significance.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jan 16;16(1):5-10. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i1.5. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38313461 Free PMC article.
-
Forrest Classification for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A New Look at the Old Endoscopic Classification.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 24;12(5):1066. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051066. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35626222 Free PMC article.
-
Goldilocks principle of minimally invasive surgery for gastric subepithelial tumors.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):1629-1640. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1629. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 37701681 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative encapsulated hemoperitoneum in a patient with gastric stromal tumor treated by exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection: A case report.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Feb 27;16(2):601-608. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.601. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024. PMID: 38463350 Free PMC article.
-
Retraction: Comparing the controlled attenuation parameter using FibroScan and attenuation imaging with ultrasound as a novel measurement for liver steatosis.PLoS One. 2022 Aug 22;17(8):e0273606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273606. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35994470 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Demetri G.D., Von Mehren M., Antonescu C.R., DeMatteo R.P., Ganjoo K.N., Maki R.G., Pisters P.W., Raut C.P., Riedel R.F., Schuetze S., et al. NCCN Task Force Report: Update on the Management of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2010;8:S1–S44. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0116. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous