Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 22;11(11):2165.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112165.

Serum Organ-Specific Anti-Heart and Anti-Intercalated Disk Autoantibodies as New Autoimmune Markers of Cardiac Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis: Frequency, Clinical and Prognostic Correlates

Affiliations

Serum Organ-Specific Anti-Heart and Anti-Intercalated Disk Autoantibodies as New Autoimmune Markers of Cardiac Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis: Frequency, Clinical and Prognostic Correlates

Alida Linda Patrizia Caforio et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Heart involvement (HInv) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) may relate to myocarditis and is associated with poor prognosis. Serum anti-heart (AHA) and anti-intercalated disk autoantibodies (AIDA) are organ and disease-specific markers of isolated autoimmune myocarditis. We assessed frequencies, clinical correlates, and prognostic impacts of AHA and AIDA in SSc.

Methods: The study included consecutive SSc patients (n = 116, aged 53 ± 13 years, 83.6% females, median disease duration 7 years) with clinically suspected heart involvement (symptoms, abnormal ECG, abnormal troponin I or natriuretic peptides, and abnormal echocardiography). All SSc patients underwent CMR. Serum AHA and AIDA were measured by indirect immunofluorescence in SSc and in control groups of non-inflammatory cardiac disease (NICD) (n = 160), ischemic heart failure (IHF) (n = 141), and normal blood donors (NBD) (n = 270). AHA and AIDA status in SSc was correlated with baseline clinical, diagnostic features, and outcome.

Results: The frequency of AHA was higher in SSc (57/116, 49%, p < 0.00001) than in NICD (2/160, 1%), IHF (2/141, 1%), or NBD (7/270, 2.5%). The frequency of AIDA was higher (65/116, 56%, p < 0.00001) in SSc than in NICD (6/160, 3.75%), IHF (3/141, 2%), or NBD (1/270, 0.37%). AHAs were associated with interstitial lung disease (p = 0.04), history of chest pain (p = 0.026), abnormal troponin (p = 0.006), AIDA (p = 0.000), and current immunosuppression (p = 0.01). AHAs were associated with death (p = 0.02) and overall cardiac events during follow-up (p = 0.017).

Conclusions: The high frequencies of AHA and AIDA suggest a high burden of underdiagnosed autoimmune HInv in SSc. In keeping with the negative prognostic impact of HInv in SSc, AHAs were associated with dismal prognosis.

Keywords: autoantibodies; autoimmunity; myocarditis; prognosis; systemic sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.M.-C. reports grants and personal fees from Actelion, personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from C.S.L. Behring, and personal fees from Eli-Lilly outside the submitted work. C.B. reports personal fees from Actelion and Eli Lilly, grants from European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) group, New Horizon Fellowship, Foundation for Research in Rheumatology (FOREUM), and Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sull’Artrite (FIRA) outside the submitted work. All other authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative Anti-Heart Auto-antibodies (AHA) and Anti-Intercalated Disk Autoantibodies (AIDA) patterns by indirect immunofluorescence test. Negative AHA, AIDA, and ANA control serum pattern on human heart tissue (panel (a), ×200) and on human skeletal muscle (panel (b), ×400). Organ-specific AHA pattern: panel (A) on human heart tissue: strong diffuse cytoplasmic staining of cardiac myocytes (organ-specific AHA pattern) (×400); panel (B) (×400) on human skeletal muscle tissue: negative. Organ-specific AHA and AIDA pattern: panel (C) strong linear staining of the intercalated disks (AIDA pattern) (white arrows) and associated organ-specific AHA diffuse and fine striational pattern (×400); panel (D) (×400) on human skeletal muscle tissue: negative. Organ-specific AHA and ANA pattern: panel (E) on human heart tissue: strong diffuse cytoplasmic staining of cardiac myocytes (organ-specific AHA pattern) and associated antinuclear antibody (ANA) (white arrows) (×200); panel (F) (×200) on human skeletal muscle tissue: negative for AHA and positive for ANA (white arrows). Note the intracellular location of ANA on human heart and the peripheral location of ANA on skeletal muscle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival curves according to auto-antibodies status. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curves in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients according to Anti-Heart Autoantibodies (AHA) status. AHA positive SSc patients have lower survival (p = 0.005). (B) Kaplan–Meier curves comparing survival in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients as a function of Anti-Centromere Autoantibody (ACA); ACA positive SSc patients have better survival (p = 0.036). (C) Anti-Nuclear Autoantibody (ANA) status. ANA positive SSc patients have better survival (p = 0.002). Kaplan–Meier curves in systemic sclerosis (SSc) comparing time to cardiac worsening as a function of (D) Anti-Heart Autoantibodies (AHA), AHA positive SSc patients have lower survival free from cardiac worsening (p = 0.017); (E) Anti-Centromere Autoantibody (ACA), ACA positive SSc patients have higher survival free from cardiac worsening (p = 0.016); (F) Anti-Nuclear Autoantibody (ANA) status. ANA positive SSc patients have higher survival free from cardiac worsening (p = 0.010). In all curves, 0 = negative antibody status, 1 = positive antibody status.

References

    1. Bournia V.-K., Tountas C., Protogerou A.D., Panopoulos S., Mavrogeni S., Sfikakis P.P. Update on assessment and management of primary cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2018;3:53–65. doi: 10.1177/2397198317747441. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore D.F., Steen V.D. Overall mortality. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2020;6:3–10. doi: 10.1177/2397198320924873. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruni C., Ross L. Cardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis: Getting to the heart of the matter. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2021;35:101668. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2021.101668. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruni C., Buch M.H., Furst D.E., De Luca G., Djokovic A., Dumitru R.B., Giollo A., Polovina M., Steelandt A., Bratis K., et al. Primary systemic sclerosis heart involvement: A systematic literature review and preliminary data-driven, consensus-based WSF/HFA definition. J. Scleroderma Relat. Disord. 2021 doi: 10.1177/23971983211053246. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mavrogeni S., Gargani L., Pepe A., Monti L., Markousis-Mavrogenis G., De Santis M., De Marchi D., Koutsogeorgopoulou L., Karabela G., Stavropoulos E., et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance predicts ventricular arrhythmias in scleroderma: The Scleroderma Arrhythmia Clinical Utility Study (SAnCtUS) Rheumatology. 2020;59:1938–1948. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources