Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 12;10(22):5265.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10225265.

Three-Device (3D) Technique for Liver Parenchyma Dissection in Robotic Liver Surgery

Affiliations

Three-Device (3D) Technique for Liver Parenchyma Dissection in Robotic Liver Surgery

Aristotelis Perrakis et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: The implementation of robotics in liver surgery offers several advantages compared to conventional open and laparoscopic techniques. One major advantage is the enhanced degree of freedom at the tip of the robotic tools compared to laparoscopic instruments. This enables excellent vessel control during inflow and outflow dissection of the liver. Parenchymal transection remains the most challenging part during robotic liver resection because currently available robotic instruments for parenchymal transection have several limitations and there is no standardized technique as of yet. We established a new strategy and share our experience.

Methods: We present a novel technique for the transection of liver parenchyma during robotic surgery, using three devices (3D) simultaneously: monopolar scissors and bipolar Maryland forceps of the robot and laparoscopic-guided waterjet. We collected the perioperative data of twenty-eight patients who underwent this procedure for minor and major liver resections between February 2019 and December 2020 from the Magdeburg Registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS).

Results: Twenty-eight patients underwent robotic-assisted 3D parenchyma dissection within the investigation period. Twelve cases of major and sixteen cases of minor hepatectomy for malignant and non-malignant cases were performed. Operative time for major liver resections (≥ 3 liver segments) was 381.7 (SD 80.6) min vs. 252.0 (70.4) min for minor resections (p < 0.01). Intraoperative measured blood loss was 495.8 (SD 508.8) ml for major and 256.3 (170.2) ml for minor liver resections (p = 0.090). The mean postoperative stay was 13.3 (SD 11.1) days for all cases. Liver surgery-related morbidity was 10.7%, no mortalities occurred. We achieved an R0 resection in all malignant cases.

Conclusions: The 3D technique for parenchyma dissection in robotic liver surgery is a safe and feasible procedure. This novel method offers an advanced locally controlled preparation of intrahepatic vessels and bile ducts. The combination of precise extrahepatic vessel handling with the 3D technique of parenchyma dissection is a fundamental step forward to the standardization of robotic liver surgery for teaching purposing and the wider adoption of robotic hepatectomy into routine patient care.

Keywords: hepatectomy; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver metastasis; liver surgery; robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trocar placement for robotic-assisted liver resection using the three device (3D) method for liver parenchyma dissection (DaVinci Xi System, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). R1: Robotic arm 1 used for bipolar Maryland forceps, R2: Robotic arm 2 used for camera, R3: Robotic arm 3 used for monopolar scissors, R4: Robotic arm 4 used for fenestrated grasp. A: Laparoscopic trocar for assistance from the table e.g., driving the waterjet (Erbejet® 2, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany). P: Trocar for pringle maneuver.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative view from the console during robotic-assisted liver resection (DaVinci Xi System, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). R1: Robotic arm 1 with bipolar Maryland forceps, A: Laparoscopic instrument (sugger) driven by the assistant from the table, R3: Robotic arm 3 with monopolar scissors, R4: Robotic arm 4 with fenestrated grasps as retraction device.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative view from the console during robotic-assisted liver resection, using the three device (3D) technique for liver parenchyma dissection (DaVinci Xi System, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). R1: Robotic arm 1 with bipolar Maryland forceps, R3: Robotic arm 3 with monopolar scissors, A: Waterjet (Erbejet® 2, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) driven as laparoscopic instrument via the assistant at the table (Video S1).

References

    1. Buell J.F., Cherqui D., Geller D.A., O’Rourke N., Iannitti D., Dagher I., Koffron A.J., Thomas M., Gayet B., Han H.S., et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann. Surg. 2009;250:825–830. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b3b2d8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gigot J.-F., Glineur D., Azagra J.S., Goergen M., Ceuterick M., Morino M., Etienne J., Marescaux J., Mutter D., van Krunckelsven L., et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: Preliminary results of a multicenter European study. Ann. Surg. 2002;236:90–97. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200207000-00014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belli G., Gayet B., Han H.S., Wakabayashi G., Kim K.H., Cannon R., Kaneko H., Gamblin T., Koffron A., Dagher I., et al. Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy a consideration for acceptance as standard of care. Surg. Endosc. 2013;27:2721–2726. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2840-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wakabayashi G., Cherqui D., Geller D.A., Buell J.F., Kaneko H., Han H.S., Asbun H., O’Rourke N., Tanabe M., Koffron A.J., et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: A report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann. Surg. 2015;261:619–629. - PubMed
    1. Choi G.H., Chong J.U., Han D.H., Choi J.S., Lee W.J. Robotic hepatectomy: The Korean experience and perspective. Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr. 2017;6:230–238. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources