Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 13;13(22):5684.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13225684.

Uveal Melanoma Metastasis

Affiliations
Review

Uveal Melanoma Metastasis

Ernesto Rossi et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by relatively few, highly incident molecular alterations and their association with metastatic risk is deeply understood. Nevertheless, this knowledge has so far not led to innovative therapies for the successful treatment of UM metastases or for adjuvant therapy, leaving survival after diagnosis of metastatic UM almost unaltered in decades. The driver mutations of UM, mainly in the G-protein genes GNAQ and GNA11, activate the MAP-kinase pathway as well as the YAP/TAZ pathway. At present, there are no drugs that target the latter and this likely explains the failure of mitogen activated kinase kinase inhibitors. Immune checkpoint blockers, despite the game changing effect in cutaneous melanoma (CM), show only limited effects in UM probably because of the low mutational burden of 0.5 per megabase and the unavailability of antibodies targeting the main immune checkpoint active in UM. The highly pro-tumorigenic microenvironment of UM also contributes to therapy resistance. However, T-cell redirection by a soluble T-cell receptor that is fused to an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment, local, liver specific therapy, new immune checkpoint blockers, and YAP/TAZ specific drugs give new hope to repeating the success of innovative therapy obtained for CM.

Keywords: immune checkpoint; molecular classification; targeted therapy; tumorigenesis; uveal melanoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

U.P. received a speaker’s honorarium from Novartis. E.R. had a role as consultant for Merck Sharpe & Dohme and Novartis. G.T. had a role as consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, AstraZeneca, and Servier.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Co-occurrence of the five major molecular features of high-risk UM.

References

    1. Jager M.J., Shields C.L., Cebulla C.M., Abdel-Rahman M.H., Grossniklaus H.E., Stern M.H., Carvajal R.D., Belfort R.N., Jia R., Shields J.A., et al. Uveal melanoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020;6:549–553. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0158-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amaro A., Gangemi R., Piaggio F., Angelini G., Barisione G., Ferrini S., Pfeffer U. The biology of uveal melanoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017;36:109–140. doi: 10.1007/s10555-017-9663-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh A.D., Topham A. Incidence of uveal melanoma in the United States: 1973–1997. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:956–961. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00078-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Virgili G., Gatta G., Ciccolallo L., Capocaccia R., Biggeri A., Crocetti E., Lutz J.M., Paci E. Incidence of Uveal Melanoma in Europe. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:2309–2315.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nayman T., Bostan C., Logan P., Burnier M.N. Uveal Melanoma Risk Factors: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses. Curr. Eye Res. 2017;42:1085–1093. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1297997. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources