Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 17;18(22):12078.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212078.

Use of the Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach to Derive Ecological Threshold of Toxicological Concern (eco-TTC) for Pesticides

Affiliations

Use of the Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach to Derive Ecological Threshold of Toxicological Concern (eco-TTC) for Pesticides

Cristiana Rizzi et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The species sensitivity distribution (SSD) calculates the hazardous concentration at which 5% of species (HC5) will be potentially affected. For many compounds, HC5 values are unavailable impeding the derivation of SSD curves. Through a detailed bibliographic survey, we selected HC5 values (from acute toxicity tests) for freshwater aquatic species and 129 pesticides. The statistical distribution and variability of the HC5 values within the chemical classes were evaluated. Insecticides are the most toxic compounds in the aquatic communities (HC5 = 1.4 × 10-3 µmol L-1), followed by herbicides (HC5 = 3.3 × 10-2 µmol L-1) and fungicides (HC5 = 7.8 µmol L-1). Subsequently, the specificity of the mode of action (MoA) of pesticides on freshwater aquatic communities was investigated by calculating the ratio between the estimated baseline toxicity for aquatic communities and the HC5 experimental values gathered from the literature. Moreover, we proposed and validated a scheme to derive the ecological thresholds of toxicological concern (eco-TTC) of pesticides for which data on their effects on aquatic communities are not available. We proposed eco-TTCs for different classes of insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides with a specific MoA, and three eco-TTCs for those chemicals with unavailable MoA. We consider the proposed approach and eco-TTC values useful for risk management purposes.

Keywords: aquatic communities; ecological threshold of toxicological concern; environmental risk assessment; pesticides; species sensitivity distribution (SSD).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distance from the baseline toxicity for aquatic communities (HC5 baseline aqcom = dashed line calculated according to Equation (1)) and log TR distribution of different classes of pesticides: insecticides (A,D); herbicides (B,E); fungicides (C,F).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tree diagram scheme to define eco-TTCs expressed in μmol L−1 for classes or groups of pesticides sharing the same mode of action.

References

    1. Hoekstra J.A., Vaal J.A., Notenboom J., Slooff W. Variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species to toxicants. Bull. Environ. Contam. Tox. 1994;53:98–105. doi: 10.1007/BF00205145. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Notenboom J., Vaal M.A., Hoekstra J.A. Using comparative ecotoxicology to develop quantitative species sensitivity relationships (QSSR) Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 1995;2:242–243. doi: 10.1007/BF02986776. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vaal M.A., van Leeuwen C.J., Hoekstra J.A., Hermens J.L.M. Variation in sensitivity of aquatic species to toxicants: Practical consequences for effect assessment of chemical substances. Environ. Manag. 2000;25:415–423. doi: 10.1007/s002679910033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Zwart D. Observed regularities in SSDs for aquatic species. In: Posthuma L., Suter G.W. II, Traas T.P., editors. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2002. pp. 133–154.
    1. Van Straalen N.M., Denneman C.A.J. Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 1989;18:241–251. doi: 10.1016/0147-6513(89)90018-3. - DOI - PubMed