Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 22;11(11):805.
doi: 10.3390/membranes11110805.

An Enhanced Sherwood Number to Model the Hydrogen Transport in Membrane Steam Reformers

Affiliations

An Enhanced Sherwood Number to Model the Hydrogen Transport in Membrane Steam Reformers

Maria Anna Murmura et al. Membranes (Basel). .

Abstract

It is well known that membrane reactors are inherently two-dimensional systems in which species concentrations vary as a consequence of both the reaction and permeation across the membrane, which occurs in the direction perpendicular to that of the main gas flow. Recently, an expression for an enhanced Sherwood number was developed to describe the hydrogen concentration gradients arising in methane steam-reforming membrane reactors as a consequence of the combined effect of hydrogen production, dispersion, and permeation. Here, the analysis is developed in further detail with the aim of (i) assessing the validity of the simplifying assumptions made when developing the 1D model and (ii) identifying the operating conditions under which it is possible to employ the 1D model with the enhanced Sherwood number.

Keywords: 2D model; concentration gradients; hydrogen; membrane reactors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hydrogen recovery, Rh, vs. pressure for a reactor operating with Da=1, Pe=100, and γ values of 1 (triangles) and 3 (circles).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ratio between the radial and axial components of velocity at 0.1, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90% of the reactor length evaluated for γ = 5, Da = 1, and (a) Pe = 20, P = 1 atm (b) Pe = 20, P = 10 atm, (c) Pe = 50, P = 1 atm, (d) Pe = 50, P = 10 atm, (e) Pe = 100, P = 1 atm, and (f) Pe = 100, P = 10 atm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hydrogen recovery vs. pressure evaluated through the full 2D model (solid lines) and 1D model with enhanced Sherwood number (dashed lines) at Da=5, γ=5, and Pe values of 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 100.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of hydrogen recovery vs. pressure evaluated through the full 2D model (solid line) and 1D model (dashed lines) with the enhanced Sherwood number (dashed lines) and the 1D model with fixed values of Sh of 3.66 and 7.75 at Da=5, γ=5, and Pe=50.

References

    1. Palo E., Salladini A., Morico B., Palma V., Ricca A., Iaquaniello G. Application of Pd-based membrane reactors: An industrial perspective. Membranes. 2018;8:101. doi: 10.3390/membranes8040101. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mosca L., Jimenez J.A.M., Wassie S.A., Gallucci F., Palo E., Colozzi M., Taraschi S., Galdieri G. Process design for green hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2020;45:7266–7277. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.206. - DOI
    1. Di Marcoberardino G., Sosio F., Manzolini G., Campanari S. Fixed bed membrane reactor for hydrogen production from steam methane reforming: Experimental and modeling approach. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2015;40:7559–7567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.045. - DOI
    1. Ma R., Castro-Dominguez B., Mardilovich I., Dixon A., Ma Y. Experimental and simulation studies of the production of renewable hydrogen through ethanol steam reforming in a large-scale catalytic membrane reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;303:302–313. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.021. - DOI
    1. Marin P., Patino Y., Diez F., Ordonez S. Modelling of hydrogen perm-selective membren reactors for catalytic methane steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2012;37:18433–18445. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.147. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources