The Use of NaOH Solutions for Fouling Control in a Membrane Bioreactor: A Feasibility Study
- PMID: 34832116
- PMCID: PMC8625605
- DOI: 10.3390/membranes11110887
The Use of NaOH Solutions for Fouling Control in a Membrane Bioreactor: A Feasibility Study
Abstract
Nowadays, the microbial production of 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PD) is recognized as preferable to the chemical synthesis. However, finding a technological approach allowing the production of 1,3-PD in the membrane bioreactor (MBR) is a great challenge. In the present study, a ceramic ultrafiltration (UF) membrane (8 kDa) for treatment of 1,3-PD broths was used. It has been demonstrated that the membrane used provides the stable permeate flux that is necessary to ensure the stability of the fermentation process in MBR technology. It was noticed that the broth pH has a significant impact on both the final 1,3-PD concentration and permeate flux. Moreover, the feasibility of using NaOH for fouling control in the MBR was evaluated. It has been shown that 1% NaOH solution is effective in restoring the initial membrane performance. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to shed light onto the possibility of reducing the amount of the alkaline solutions generated during the MBR operation. Indeed, it has been found that 1% NaOH solution can be successfully used several times for both membrane cleaning and to stabilize the broth pH. Finally, based on the results obtained, the technological conceptions of the MBR technology were designed.
Keywords: ceramic membrane; fermentation; fouling; membrane bioreactor design; membrane cleaning; sodium hydroxide; ultrafiltration.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures











Similar articles
-
The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.Water Res. 2018 Feb 1;129:180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 7. Water Res. 2018. PMID: 29149673
-
Clarification of 1,3-Propanediol Fermentation Broths by Using a Ceramic Fine UF Membrane.Membranes (Basel). 2020 Oct 30;10(11):319. doi: 10.3390/membranes10110319. Membranes (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33143063 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Polypropylene and Ceramic Microfiltration Membranes Applied for Separation of 1,3-PD Fermentation Broths and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Suspensions.Membranes (Basel). 2021 Jan 8;11(1):44. doi: 10.3390/membranes11010044. Membranes (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33435635 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of textile wastewater with membrane bioreactor: A critical review.Bioresour Technol. 2016 Mar;204:202-212. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 8. Bioresour Technol. 2016. PMID: 26776150 Review.
-
The Advancement in Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology toward Sustainable Industrial Wastewater Management.Membranes (Basel). 2023 Feb 2;13(2):181. doi: 10.3390/membranes13020181. Membranes (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36837685 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
New Low-Cost Ceramic Microfiltration Membranes for Bacteria Removal.Membranes (Basel). 2022 Apr 30;12(5):490. doi: 10.3390/membranes12050490. Membranes (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35629816 Free PMC article.
-
The Resistance of Polyethersulfone Membranes on the Alkaline Cleaning Solutions.Membranes (Basel). 2024 Jan 23;14(2):27. doi: 10.3390/membranes14020027. Membranes (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38392654 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Roccaro P., Vagliasindi F.G.A. Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier; Oxford, UK: 2020. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater reclamation: Cost analysis; pp. 311–322.
-
- Do K.-U., Chu X.-Q. Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes. Elsevier; Oxford, UK: 2022. Performances of membrane bioreactor technology for treating domestic wastewater operated at different sludge retention time; pp. 107–122.
-
- Vural C., Topbaş T., Dağlıoğlu S.T., Dağlı Ö., Oral R., Kabay N., Özdemir G. Assessment of microbial and ecotoxicological qualities of industrial wastewater treated with membrane bioreactor (MBR) process for agricultural irrigation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021;232:442. doi: 10.1007/s11270-021-05372-0. - DOI
-
- Collivignarelli M.C., Abbà A., Carnevale Miino M., Caccamo F.M., Argiolas S., Bellazzi S., Baldi M., Bertanza G. Strong minimization of biological sludge production and enhancement of phosphorus bioavailability with a thermophilic biological fluidized bed reactor. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021;155:262–276. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.09.026. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases