High-Grade Limbs Open Fractures: Time to Find Milestones in the Emergency Setting
- PMID: 34833102
- PMCID: PMC8617751
- DOI: 10.3390/life11111226
High-Grade Limbs Open Fractures: Time to Find Milestones in the Emergency Setting
Abstract
(1) Background: The Gustilo-Anderson (G/A) grading system is a universally accepted tool used to classify high-grade limb open fractures. The purpose of this study is to find early independent predictors of amputation in emergency settings. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis involving patients treated at our center between 2010 and 2016 was conducted. Patients with at least one G/A grade III fracture or post-traumatic amputation were included. Three groups were identified: G/A IIIA (A group), G/A IIIB-C (BC group), and Amputation group (AMP group). Each group was further divided into two subgroups considering timing of coverage (early vs. delayed). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were developed to identify independent predictors of the limb's outcome. (3) Results: One-hundred-six patients with G/A III A-B-C fractures or amputation of the affected limb were selected from the Niguarda Hospital Trauma Registry. The patients were divided into the A group (26), BC group (66), and AMP group (14). The rate of infectious complications following early or delayed coverage was evaluated: A group, 9.1% vs. 66.7% (p > 0.05); BC group, 32% vs. 63.6% (p = 0.03); and AMP group, 22% vs. 18.5% (p > 0.05). After further recategorization, the BC subgroups were analyzed: multivariate logistic regression model identified systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg (p = 0.03) and Mangled Extremity Severity Score MESS ≥ 7 (p = 0.001) were determined to be independent predictors of limb amputation. (4) Conclusion: MESS and SBP serve as predictors of amputation. Based on the results, we propose a new management algorithm for mangled extremities. Early coverage is related to lower rates of infectious complications. Referral to high-volume centers with specific expertise is mandatory to guarantee the best results.
Keywords: Gustilo–Anderson; Mangled Extremity Severity Score; extremity injuries; trauma.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Third degree open fractures and traumatic sub-/total amputations of the upper extremity: Outcome and relevance of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Oct;102(6):785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 18. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016. PMID: 27209033
-
Reliability of the mangled extremity severity score in combat-related upper and lower extremity injuries.Indian J Orthop. 2015 Nov-Dec;49(6):656-60. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.168759. Indian J Orthop. 2015. PMID: 26806974 Free PMC article.
-
Re-evaluation of cutting criteria for limb amputation using the Mangled Extremity Severity Score.Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Mar 28;10(1):e001694. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001694. eCollection 2025. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025. PMID: 40166773 Free PMC article.
-
Ganga hospital open injury score in management of open injuries.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Feb;41(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0465-9. Epub 2014 Nov 6. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015. PMID: 26038161 Review.
-
IDCRP Combat-Related Extremity Wound Infection Research.Mil Med. 2022 May 4;187(Suppl 2):25-33. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab065. Mil Med. 2022. PMID: 35512376 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Masquelet technique combined with modified Sauve‑Kapandji, negative pressure drainage and flap transplantation for the treatment of a Gustilo‑Anderson III type C open fracture of the forearm: A case report.Exp Ther Med. 2022 Aug 2;24(4):610. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11546. eCollection 2022 Oct. Exp Ther Med. 2022. PMID: 36160899 Free PMC article.
References
-
- ISTAT L’evoluzione della mortalità per causa: Le prime 25 cause di morte. Stat. Rep. 2017;4:21.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources