Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 20;11(11):1270.
doi: 10.3390/life11111270.

Will Remotely Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Water Down Its Effectiveness?

Himanshu Rawal  1 , Sharon D Cornelison  2 , Sheryl M Flynn  3 , Jill A Ohar  1
Affiliations
Review

Will Remotely Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Water Down Its Effectiveness?

Himanshu Rawal et al. Life (Basel). .

Abstract

Despite numerous benefits, traditional Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) as a resource remains underutilized in chronic lung disease. Less than 3% of eligible candidates for PR attend one or more sessions after hospitalization due to many barriers, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging alternative models of PR delivery such as home-based PR, tele-rehabilitation, web-based PR, or hybrid models could help address these barriers. Numerous studies have tested the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of these methods, but there is wide variability across studies and methods. We conducted a literature review to help determine if these alternative delivery methods watered down the effectiveness of PR. To evaluate the effectiveness of remotely based PR, the authors performed a literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case series using PubMed, CINAHL, and Medline to identify relevant articles through 1 May 2021. Twenty-six applicable studies were found in which 11 compared tele-rehabilitation to conventional clinic-based PR; 11 evaluated tele-rehabilitation using the patient's baseline status as control; and four compared tele-rehabilitation to no rehabilitation. Despite the different technologies used across studies, tele-rehabilitation was found to be both a feasible and an efficacious option for select patients with lung disease. Outcomes across these studies demonstrated similar benefits to traditional PR programs. Thus the existing data does not show that remotely based PR waters down the effectiveness of conventional PR. Use of remotely based PR is a feasible and effective option to deliver PR, especially for patients with significant barriers to conventional clinic-based PR. Additional, well-conducted RCTs are needed to answer the questions regarding its efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and who, among patients with COPD and other lung diseases, will derive the maximum benefit.

Keywords: COPD; pulmonary; remotely; tele-rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Sheryl Flynn is the CEO of Blue Marble Health and could benefit financially from the sale of products developed by Blue Marble Health. Sheryl Flynn is the PI of an NIH grant (R44HL137502) that is evaluating the feasibility of a digital pulmonary rehabilitation platform developed by her company.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram illustrating selection of eligible studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rochester C.L., Vogiatzis I., Holland A.E., Lareau S.C., Marciniuk D.D., Puhan M.A., Masefield S.C., Casaburi R., Clini E. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Policy Statement: Enhancing Implementation, Use, and Delivery of Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015;192:1373–1386. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201510-1966ST. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spruit M.A., Singh S.J., Garvey C., ZuWallack R., Nici L., Rochester C., Hill K., Holland A.E., Lareau S.C., Man W.D.C., et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013;188:e13–e64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolton C.E., Bevan-Smith E.F., Blakey J.D., Crowe P., Elkin S.L., Garrod R., Greening N.J., Heslop K., Hull J.H., Man W.D.-C., et al. British Thoracic Society guideline on pulmonary rehabilitation in adults. Thorax. 2013;68((Suppl. 2)):ii1–ii30. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203808. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maltais F., Decramer M., Casaburi R., Barreiro E., Burelle Y., Debigare R., Dekhuijzen P.R., Franssen F., Gayan-Ramirez G., Gea J., et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Update on limb muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014;189:e15–e62. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0373ST. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lacasse Y., Goldstein R., Lasserson T.J., Martin S. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2006;2:CD003793. - PubMed