Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
- PMID: 34835426
- PMCID: PMC8625337
- DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9112300
Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
Abstract
Campylobacteriosis is the most common bacterial foodborne illness in the United States and is frequently associated with foods of animal origin. The goals of this study were to compare clinical and non-clinical Campylobacter populations from Tennessee (TN) and Pennsylvania (PA), use phylogenetic relatedness to assess source attribution patterns, and identify potential outbreak clusters. Campylobacter isolates studied (n = 3080) included TN clinical isolates collected and sequenced for routine surveillance, PA clinical isolates collected from patients at the University of Pennsylvania Health System facilities, and non-clinical isolates from both states for which sequencing reads were available on NCBI. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted to categorize isolates into species groups and determine the population structure of each species. Most isolates were C. jejuni (n = 2132, 69.2%) and C. coli (n = 921, 29.9%), while the remaining were C. lari (0.4%), C. upsaliensis (0.3%), and C. fetus (0.1%). The C. jejuni group consisted of three clades; most non-clinical isolates were of poultry (62.7%) or cattle (35.8%) origin, and 59.7 and 16.5% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry or cattle, respectively. The C. coli isolates grouped into two clades; most non-clinical isolates were from poultry (61.2%) or swine (29.0%) sources, and 74.5, 9.2, and 6.1% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry, cattle, or swine, respectively. Based on genomic similarity, we identified 42 C. jejuni and one C. coli potential outbreak clusters. The C. jejuni clusters contained 188 clinical isolates, 19.6% of the total C. jejuni clinical isolates, suggesting that a larger proportion of campylobacteriosis may be associated with outbreaks than previously determined.
Keywords: Campylobacter; Campylobacter coli; Campylobacter jejuni; source attribution.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Tack D.M., Ray L., Griffin P.M., Cieslak P.R., Dunn J., Rissman T., Jervis R., Lathrop S., Muse A., Duwell M. Preliminary incidence and trends of infections with pathogens transmitted commonly through food—Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 US Sites, 2016–2019. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020;69:509. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6917a1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), E.R.S.E Cost Estimates of Foodborne Illnesses. [(accessed on 16 August 2021)]; Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/cost-estimates-of-foodborne-illne...
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Campylobacter (Campylobacteriosis): Questions and Answers. [(accessed on 28 January 2021)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/campylobacter/faq.html.
-
- Parte A.C. LPSN—List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018;68:1825–1829. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002786. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
