Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 22;11(11):2799.
doi: 10.3390/nano11112799.

Influence of Bioinspired Lithium-Doped Titanium Implants on Gingival Fibroblast Bioactivity and Biofilm Adhesion

Affiliations

Influence of Bioinspired Lithium-Doped Titanium Implants on Gingival Fibroblast Bioactivity and Biofilm Adhesion

Aya Q Alali et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

Soft tissue integration (STI) at the transmucosal level around dental implants is crucial for the long-term success of dental implants. Surface modification of titanium dental implants could be an effective way to enhance peri-implant STI. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of bioinspired lithium (Li)-doped Ti surface on the behaviour of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) and oral biofilm in vitro. HGFs were cultured on various Ti surfaces-Li-doped Ti (Li_Ti), NaOH_Ti and micro-rough Ti (Control_Ti)-and were evaluated for viability, adhesion, extracellular matrix protein expression and cytokine secretion. Furthermore, single species bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) and multi-species oral biofilms from saliva were cultured on each surface and assessed for viability and metabolic activity. The results show that both Li_Ti and NaOH_Ti significantly increased the proliferation of HGFs compared to the control. Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) mRNA levels were significantly increased on Li_Ti and NaOH_Ti at day 7. Moreover, Li_Ti upregulated COL-I and fibronectin gene expression compared to the NaOH_Ti. A significant decrease in bacterial metabolic activity was detected for both the Li_Ti and NaOH_Ti surfaces. Together, these results suggest that bioinspired Li-doped Ti promotes HGF bioactivity while suppressing bacterial adhesion and growth. This is of clinical importance regarding STI improvement during the maintenance phase of the dental implant treatment.

Keywords: biofilm; gingival fibroblasts; implants; nanostructure; soft-tissue integration; surface modification; titanium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Top view SEM images showing the surface of Ti substrates. (a) Lithium-incorporated Ti (Li_Ti), (b) alkaline-treated Ti (without Li) (NaOH_Ti) and (c) mechanically micro-machined Ti (Control_Ti). All scale bars represent 1 um.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Viability and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts. (a) Confocal microscopy images of Live-Dead staining over Li_Ti, NaOH_Ti and Control_Ti substrates at day 1, (b) analysis of PicoGreen assay for DNA content. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Human gingival fibroblasts’ attachment. (af) Nuclei (blue) and actin F (red) staining using confocal microscopy images of HGFs at 4 and 24 h, (gi) SEM images of the HGF over Ti groups, ×1000 magnification.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cell morphology analysis at 4 and 24 h culture. (a) Nuclei counts, (b) cell length, and (c) length-to-width ratio (Aspect Ratio). Three-dimensional confocal microscopy images in Figure 3 were used for the analysis, * p < 0.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Human gingival fibroblasts characterisation 7 days after culture. (ac) Confocal microscopy images of HGF at day 7 showing nuclei (blue) and Actin F (red) staining, (d) PicoGreen assay for DNA content, (ei) HGF gene expression showing the fold change of COL-I, COL-III, CXCL8, fibronectin and IL1β. Dotted lines refers to the reference value * p < 0.05; # p < 0.01.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Multiplex ELISA quantification of conditioned media concentrations of FGF-2 (a), MMP-8 (b), MMP-1 (c), PDGF-BB (d) and VEGF (e) from HGF cultures with Ti substrates. * p < 0.05.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Metabolic activity (a,c), and live (green)/dead (red) staining (b,d) of single species (S. aureus) and multispecies (saliva) biofilm on three Ti substrates (Li_Ti, NaOH_Ti and Control_Ti) after 1 and 3 days of culture. * p < 0.05 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

References

    1. Roos J., Sennerby L., Lekholm U.L.F., Jemt T., Gröndahl K., Albrektsson T. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: A 5-year retrospective analysis of the Branemark implant. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 1997;12:1–20. - PubMed
    1. Becker W., Becker B.E., Newman M.G., Nyman S. Clinical and microbiologic findings that may contribute to dental implant failure. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 1990;5:1–17. - PubMed
    1. Ivanovski S., Lee R. Comparison of peri-implant and periodontal marginal soft tissues in health and disease. Periodontology 2000. 2018;76:116–130. doi: 10.1111/prd.12150. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berglundh T., Armitage G., Araujo M.G., Avila-Ortiz G., Blanco J., Camargo P.M., Chen S., Cochran D., Derks J., Figuero E., et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J. Periodontol. 2018;89:S313–S318. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0739. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maksoud M.A. Manipulation of the peri-implant tissue for better maintenance: A periodontal perspective. J. Oral Implant. 2003;29:120–123. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0120:MOTPIT>2.3.CO;2. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources