Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Oct 21;13(11):3701.
doi: 10.3390/nu13113701.

Do Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Promote Good Health in Humans? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Randomized Controlled Trials

Eileen Bogweh Nchanji  1 , Odhiambo Collins Ageyo  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Do Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Promote Good Health in Humans? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Randomized Controlled Trials

Eileen Bogweh Nchanji et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

The common bean is a nutrient-dense food empirically known to have beneficial effects on human health. Many studies have looked at the effects of "pulses" on different health issues, providing general overviews of the importance of each pulse in health studies. This study systematically reviews and provides meta-analyses of the effect of bean extract as a supplement or whole bean on four health issues (cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and cancers) from a dissection of clinical and randomized controlled trials using human subjects. A digital search in PubMed and Google ScholarTM resulted in 340 articles, with only 23 peer-reviewed articles matching our inclusion criteria. Findings indicated that common beans reduced LDL cholesterol by 19 percent, risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) by 11 percent, and coronary heart disease (CHD) by 22 percent. Besides this, we noted variances in the literature on cancer findings, with some authors stating it reduced the proliferation of some kinds of tumor cells and reduced the growth of polyps, while others did not specifically examine cancers but the predisposing factors alone. However, diabetes studies indicated that the postprandial glucose level at the peak of 60 min for common bean consumers was low (mean difference = -2.01; 95% CI [-4.6, -0.63]), but the difference between the treated and control was not significant, and there was a high level of heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 98%). Only obesity studies indicated a significantly high level of weight gain among control groups (mean difference = 1.62; 95% CI [0.37, 2.86]). There is a need for additional clinical trials using a standardized measure to indicate the real effect of the common bean on health.

Keywords: cancers; cardiovascular diseases; common beans; diabetes mellitus; health; human trials; obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart indicating studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Source: Author’s representation based on the PRISMA guidelines of Moher et al. [24].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot empirical estimation of study impact for diabetes and obesity health issues.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ferreira H., Vasconcelos M., Gil A.M., Pinto E. Benefits of pulse consumption on metabolism and health: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021;61:85–96. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1716680. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aseete P., Katungi E., Bonabana-Wabbi J., Birachi E., Ugen M.A. Consumer demand heterogeneity and valuation of value-added pulse products: A case of precooked beans in Uganda. Agric. Food Secur. 2018;7:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s40066-018-0203-3. - DOI
    1. FAO . In: The Global Economy of Pulse. Rawal V., Navarro D., editors. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2019.
    1. Nakazi F., Njuki J., Ugen M.A., Aseete P., Katungi E., Birachi E., Kabanyoro R., Mugagga I.J., Nanyonjo G. Is bean really a women’s crop? Men and women’s participation in bean production in Uganda. Agric. Food Secur. 2017;6:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40066-017-0102-z. - DOI
    1. Nchanji E.B., Ssekandi W., Nanyongo G., Bantebya G. Gendered Varietal and Trait Preferences of Common Bean Value Chain Actors in Uganda: Implications for breeding. GREAT Virtual Symposium. [(accessed on 20 October 2021)]. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9GoZYvik2I.

LinkOut - more resources