BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes
- PMID: 34836730
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.026
BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes
Abstract
Approximately 60% of implant-based breast reconstructions (IBBR) are performed with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM), for which, reliable, good quality long-term outcome data is limited. In a retrospective multicentre cohort study, we aimed to determine long-term aesthetic and quality of life outcomes of IBBR with ADM (Strattice™) compared to a submuscular technique.
Methods: Capsular contracture (Baker III/IV capsule) was determined by clinical examination by an independent researcher. Quality of life was assessed using BREAST-Q and aesthetic outcome by photographic assessment from a breast surgeon, breast care nurse and lay person, blinded to reconstruction type.
Results: We recruited 117 (51 bilateral) patients with ADM reconstructions, median follow-up 62 months (range 29-113) and 49 patients (16 bilateral) with submuscular reconstructions, median follow-up 76 months (range 38-111). 17 (10.1%) ADM reconstructions were Baker 3/4 compared to six (9.2%) submuscular (p = 0.85). Of the Baker 1/2 reconstructions six (3.6%) ADM and eight (13.6%) submuscular had previously undergone revision surgery to correct capsular contracture (p = 0.01). Combining both findings gave an estimated rate of capsular contracture of 13.6% in the ADM group and 21.2% in the submuscular (p = 0.14). A higher mean score for satisfaction with breasts was demonstrated when comparing ADM to submuscular (62 and 55, respectively; p = 0.01) but no significant difference in other BREAST-Q domains. The mean 'general satisfaction' score was higher in the ADM group for all three photograph assessors.
Conclusion: This study provides evidence of improved aesthetic outcome and reduction in capsular contracture with ADM reconstruction when compared to submuscular, consistent over long-term follow-up.
Keywords: Acellular dermal matrix; Breast; Implant; Reconstruction; Strattice.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A Comparison of Dermal Autograft and Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Aesthetic Outcomes and Capsular Contracture.Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;74 Suppl 4:S214-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000375. Ann Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 25389715
-
Breast Reconstruction Outcomes with and without Strattice: Long-Term Outcomes of a Multicenter Study Comparing Strattice Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction with Submuscular Implant Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jul 1;152(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010157. Epub 2023 Jun 29. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023. PMID: 36728408 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):1205-1214. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30378-4. Epub 2018 Aug 10. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30104147 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix Type in Treatment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Dec 14;44(1):26-35. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad265. Aesthet Surg J. 2023. PMID: 37595294
-
Does the use of Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review.BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1186. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12978-0. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39333948 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A comparison of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) efficacy and complication profile in women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 31;24(1):1598. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13359-3. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39741248 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and issues in clinical research on satisfaction and quality of life after mastectomy and breast reconstruction: a 5-year scoping review.Int J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;28(7):847-859. doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02347-5. Epub 2023 May 9. Int J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37160493 Free PMC article.
-
A Long-term Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction following Risk-reducing Mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e5951. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005951. eCollection 2024 Jul. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 38957718 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study.Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1815-1823. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad276. Br J Surg. 2023. PMID: 37766501 Free PMC article.
-
The Usage of Mesh and Relevant Prognosis in Implant Breast Reconstruction Surgery: A Meta-analysis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Sep;48(17):3386-3399. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03879-5. Epub 2024 Mar 4. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 38438762
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical