Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 27;18(1):120.
doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00564-7.

Decolonizing drug policy

Affiliations
Review

Decolonizing drug policy

Colleen Daniels et al. Harm Reduct J. .

Abstract

This paper reviews evidence of how drug control has been used to uphold colonial power structures in select countries. It demonstrates the racist and xenophobic impact of drug control policy and proposes a path to move beyond oppressive systems and structures. The 'colonization of drug control' refers to the use of drug control by states in Europe and America to advance and sustain the systematic exploitation of people, land and resources and the racialized hierarchies, which were established under colonial control and continue to dominate today. Globally, Black, Brown and Indigenous peoples are disproportionately targeted for drug law enforcement and face discrimination across the criminal system. These communities face higher arrest, prosecution and incarceration rates for drug offenses than other communities, such as majority populations, despite similar rates of drug use and selling among (and between) different races. Current drug policies have contributed to an increase in drug-related deaths, overdoses and sustained transnational criminal enterprises at the expense of the lives of people who use drugs, their families and greater society. This review provides further evidence of the need to reform the current system. It outlines a three-pillared approach to rebuilding drug policy in a way that supports health, dignity and human rights, consisting of: (1) the decriminalization of drugs and their use; (2) an end to the mass incarceration of people who use drugs; (3) the redirection of funding away from ineffective and punitive drug control and toward health and social programs.

Keywords: Drug control policy; Human rights; War on drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Alexander M. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, The New Press. 2012.
    1. Kerr J, Jackson J. Stigma, sexual risks, and the war on drugs: examining drug policy and HIV/AIDS Inequities among African Americans using the Drug War HIV/AIDS Inequities Model. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;37:31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.07.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper HLF. War on drugs policing and police brutality. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(8–9):1188–1194. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1007669. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laios K, et al. Drugs for mental illnesses in ancient greek medicine. Psychiatriki. 2019;30(1):58–65. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.301.58. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hobson C. Challenging “evil”: Continuity and change in the drug prohibition regime. Int Polit. 2014;51:525–542. doi: 10.1057/ip.2014.17. - DOI

Substances