Assessing the evidence on remdesivir
- PMID: 34838222
- PMCID: PMC9760123
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00695-2
Assessing the evidence on remdesivir
Conflict of interest statement
This work is a collaboration within the EU-RESPONSE project, which has received funding from the EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme, under the grant number 101015736. MT has participated without pay in Eli Lilly's European advisory board. MH has received funding for the DisCoVeRy and COV-AID trials from the Federal Belgian Center for Knowledge and the joint Université Libre de Bruxelles-Fonds Erasme-COVID-19 projects. MH has also participated in Gilead's educational advisory board on invasive aspergillosis infections, is an editor of the Belgian Framingham's Journal on Infectious Diseases, and received support from Pfizer to attend the ECCMID 2021 congress. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Assessing the evidence on remdesivir.Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;21(12):1630. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00693-9. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 34838223 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ader F, Bouscambert-Duchamp M, Hites M, et al. Remdesivir plus standard of care versus standard of care alone for the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (DisCoVeRy): a phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00485-0. published online Sept 14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hill JA, Paredes Deiros R, Vaca C, et al. IDWeek; 2021. Remdesivir for the treatment of high-risk non-hospitalized individuals with COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. online; Sept 29 to Oct 3, 2021 (oral LB1).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources