Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 15:465:153053.
doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.153053. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

Alternative animal models in predictive toxicology

Affiliations
Review

Alternative animal models in predictive toxicology

Muhammad Nur Hamizan Khabib et al. Toxicology. .

Abstract

Toxicity testing relies heavily on animals, especially rodents as part of the non-clinical laboratory testing of substances. However, the use of mammalians and the number of animals employed in research has become a concern for institutional ethics committees. Toxicity testing involving rodents and other mammals is laborious and costly. Alternatively, non-rodent models are used as replacement, as they have less ethical considerations and are cost-effective. Of the many alternative models that can be used as replacement models, which ones can be used in predictive toxicology? What is the correlation between these models and rodents? Are there standardized protocols governing the toxicity testing of these commonly used predictive models? This review outlines the common alternative animal models for predictive toxicology to address the importance of these models, the challenges, and their standard testing protocols.

Keywords: Alternative animal models; Invertebrates; Predictive toxicology; Standard testing protocols; Toxicity testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources