Comparison of Outcomes Between Cage Materials Used for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Standalone Cages: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 34838765
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.084
Comparison of Outcomes Between Cage Materials Used for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Standalone Cages: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Interbody cages are currently being used to address diseases of the vertebra requiring surgical stabilization. Titanium cages were first introduced in 1988. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are used frequently as one of the alternatives to titanium cages in current practice. This study aimed to compare available cage materials by reviewing the surgical and radiographic outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Methods: A comprehensive search of several electronic databases was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, arthrodesis rates, subsidence rates, and complications were collected from included studies. Collected outcomes were further stratified according to the procedure type, the number of levels operated, and graft used to compare cage materials.
Results: Following the screening for inclusion criteria, a total of 37 studies with 2363 patients were included. The median age was 49.5 years and the median follow-up was 26 months. Overall, no significant differences were found between PEEK and titanium cages regarding fusion, neurologic deficit, subsidence rates, or "good and excellent" outcome according to Odom criteria. However, the standalone comparison between PEEK, titanium, and poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cages showed a significantly lower fusion rate for PMMA (PEEK: 94%, PMMA: 56%, titanium: 95%, P < 0.01).
Conclusions: In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, a comparison of the long-term patient-reported and the radiographic outcomes associated with the use of titanium and PEEK, intervertebral body cages showed similar findings. However, there were significantly lower fusion rates for PMMA cages when using a standalone cage without graft material.
Keywords: ACDF; Cage; PEEK; PMMA; Spine; Titanium.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul;23(5):310-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181af3a84. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010. PMID: 20124907
-
Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.062. Epub 2017 Jul 21. J Clin Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28736113 Review.
-
Incidence and clinical relevance of cage subsidence in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Apr;160(4):873-880. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3490-3. Epub 2018 Feb 21. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018. PMID: 29468440 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using titanium-coated polyetheretherketone stand-alone cages: Multicenter prospective study of incidence of cage subsidence.J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Apr;74:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.056. Epub 2020 Jan 23. J Clin Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 31983642
-
Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):2889-2900. doi: 10.1111/os.13896. Epub 2023 Sep 28. Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 37771127 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Zero-Profile Stand-Alone Cages Versus Traditional Cage-and-Plate Constructs in Single and Multi-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis Using Validated Fusion Assessment Methods.Global Spine J. 2025 Apr 14:21925682251329228. doi: 10.1177/21925682251329228. Online ahead of print. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40229971 Free PMC article.
-
Interim 1-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Hydroxyapatite-Infused Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages.Int J Spine Surg. 2024 May 6;18(2):122-129. doi: 10.14444/8585. Int J Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 38378231 Free PMC article.
-
Fundamentals of Mechanobiology and Potential Applications in Spinal Fusion.Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 27;17(S3):S61-S74. doi: 10.14444/8562. Int J Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 38135446 Free PMC article.
-
Polyetheretherketone vs Titanium Cages in Spinal Fusion: Spin Bias in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.Global Spine J. 2025 Apr 16:21925682251336750. doi: 10.1177/21925682251336750. Online ahead of print. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40239031 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical Radiculopathy: Focus on Factors for Better Surgical Outcomes and Operative Techniques.Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):995-1012. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0445. Epub 2022 Dec 29. Asian Spine J. 2022. PMID: 36599372 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources