Use of Real-World Evidence to Drive Drug Development Strategy and Inform Clinical Trial Design
- PMID: 34839524
- PMCID: PMC9299990
- DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2480
Use of Real-World Evidence to Drive Drug Development Strategy and Inform Clinical Trial Design
Abstract
Interest in real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) to expedite and enrich the development of new biopharmaceutical products has proliferated in recent years, spurred by the 21st Century Cures Act in the United States and similar policy efforts in other countries, willingness by regulators to consider RWE in their decisions, demands from third-party payers, and growing concerns about the limitations of traditional clinical trials. Although much of the recent literature on RWE has focused on potential regulatory uses (e.g., product approvals in oncology or rare diseases based on single-arm trials with external control arms), this article reviews how biopharmaceutical companies can leverage RWE to inform internal decisions made throughout the product development process. Specifically, this article will review use of RWD to guide pipeline and portfolio strategy; use of novel sources of RWD to inform product development, use of RWD to inform clinical development, use of advanced analytics to harness "big" RWD, and considerations when using RWD to inform internal decisions. Topics discussed will include the use of molecular, clinicogenomic, medical imaging, radiomic, and patient-derived xenograft data to augment traditional sources of RWE, the use of RWD to inform clinical trial eligibility criteria, enrich trial population based on predicted response, select endpoints, estimate sample size, understand disease progression, and enhance diversity of participants, the growing use of data tokenization and advanced analytical techniques based on artificial intelligence in RWE, as well as the importance of data quality and methodological transparency in RWE.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no competing interests for this work.
References
-
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) . Framework for FDA’s Real World Evidence Program. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 2018).
-
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) . Sentinel System: Five‐Year Strategy 2019–2023. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, 2019).
-
- Franklin, J.M. et al. Nonrandomized real‐world evidence to support regulatory decision making: process for a randomized trial replication project. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 107, 817–826 (2020). - PubMed
-
- Orsini, L.S. et al. Improving transparency to build trust in real‐world secondary data studies for hypothesis testing‐why, what, and how: recommendations and a road map from the real‐world evidence transparency initiative. Value Health 23, 1128–1136 (2020). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
