Aggressive containment, suppression, and mitigation of covid-19: lessons learnt from eight countries
- PMID: 34840136
- PMCID: PMC8624062
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067508
Aggressive containment, suppression, and mitigation of covid-19: lessons learnt from eight countries
Abstract
Shishi Wu and colleagues examine three distinct response strategies for covid-19 in eight countries and argue that aggressive containment is the optimal approach to limiting loss of lives and livelihoods and achievable in the absence of vaccines and effective therapies
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have the following interests to declare: All authors declare no conflict of interest. The Secretariat of the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response is independent.
Figures
References
-
- Ferguson N, Laydon D, Nedjati Gilani G, et al. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce covid-19 mortality and healthcare demand. 2020. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-... - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chowdhury R, Heng K, Shawon MSR, et al. Global Dynamic Interventions Strategies for COVID-19 Collaborative Group . Dynamic interventions to control covid-19 pandemic: a multivariate prediction modelling study comparing 16 worldwide countries. Eur J Epidemiol 2020;35:389-99. 10.1007/s10654-020-00649-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- James A, Hendy SC, Plank MJ, et al. Suppression and mitigation strategies for control of covid-19 in New Zealand. medRxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.03.26.20044677 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical