Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec:192:765-781.
doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.032. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines

Affiliations

Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines

Gyula Seres et al. J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the introduction of mandatory face mask usage triggered a heated debate. A major point of controversy is whether community use of masks creates a false sense of security that would diminish physical distancing, counteracting any potential direct benefit from masking. We conducted a randomized field experiment in Berlin, Germany, to investigate how masks affect distancing and whether the mask effect interacts with the introduction of an indoor mask mandate. Joining waiting lines in front of stores, we measured distances kept from the experimenter in two treatment conditions - the experimenter wore a mask in one and no face covering in the other - in two time spans - before and after mask use becoming mandatory in stores. We find no evidence that mandatory masking has a negative effect on distance kept toward a masked person. To the contrary, masks significantly increase distancing and the effect does not differ between the two periods. However, we show that after the mandate distances are shorter in locations where more non-essential stores, which were closed before the mandate, had reopened. We argue that the relaxations in general restrictions that coincided with the mask mandate led individuals to reduce other precautions, like keeping a safe distance.

Keywords: COVID-19; Face masks; Field experiment; Health policy; Risk compensation; Social distancing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mask usage by age.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of distance kept from the experimenter. The white dots represent the averages, the gray bars the interquartile ranges, and the light gray areas the kernel density of the distributions.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of distances kept by the subject from the experimenter in NoMask (blue) and Mask (red) conditions (in centimeter), separately in the April (Policy=0), the May (Policy=1), and the full sample. Cumulative distributions are exact and densities are estimated univariate Epanechnikov kernel density estimation (KDE) functions. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

References

    1. Abaluck J., Kwong L.H., Styczynski A., Haque A., Kabir M.A., Bates-Jefferys E., Crawford E., Benjamin-Chung J., Benhachmi S., Raihan S., et al. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2021. Normalizing Community Mask-Wearing: A Cluster Randomized Trial in Bangladesh.
    1. Adams J., Hillman M. The risk compensation theory and bicycle helmets. Injury Prev. 2001;7(2):89–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ajzenman N., Cavalcanti T., Da Mata D. Available at SSRN 3582908. 2020. More Than Words: Leaders’ Speech and Risky Behavior during a Pandemic.
    1. Allcott H., Boxell L., Conway J., Gentzkow M., Thaler M., Yang D. Polarization and public health: partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. J. Public Econ. 2020;191:104254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alvarez F.E., Argente D., Lippi F. NBER Working Paper 26981. 2020. A Simple Planning Problem for COVID-19 Lockdown.

LinkOut - more resources