Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Nov 17:2021:4558279.
doi: 10.1155/2021/4558279. eCollection 2021.

Effects of Combined Cognitive and Exercise Interventions on Poststroke Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of Combined Cognitive and Exercise Interventions on Poststroke Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ruifeng Sun et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Objective: We investigated combined cognitive and exercise interventions in the literature and summarized their effectiveness in improving poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). Data Sources. Electronic databases and trial registries were searched from their inception until July 2020. Study Selection. Trials were collected with the following study inclusion criteria: (1) patients over 18 years of age who were diagnosed with PSCI; (2) combined cognitive-exercise interventions, regardless of the order of the two types of interventions or whether they were administered simultaneously; (3) any control group studied at the same time that was deemed acceptable, including no intervention/routine care, delayed intervention, sham intervention, and passive training; (4) the use of any validated cognitive neuropsychological test to evaluate cognitive function; and (5) clinically administered random trials with controls. Data Extraction. Five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of the full texts and methodological quality of the included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Inconsistent results were resolved by additional discussion or decided by a third examiner, if necessary. Data Analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the combined interventions had a significant effect on executive function and working memory [Stroop test (time), standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.04, p = 0.02; Trail Making Test, SMD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.82-0.16, p = 0.004; Forward Digit Span Test, SMD = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.54-1.29, p ≤ 0.001]. While it was impossible to conduct a meta-analysis of global cognitive function and other cognitive domains, individual experiments demonstrated that the combined interventions played a significant role in global cognition, reasoning ability, logical thinking, and visual-spatial memory function.

Conclusions: Our analyses demonstrated that the combined interventions had a significant effect on the improvement of PSCI, particularly in terms of executive function. However, the moderate risk of bias in the included trials and the small number of relevant studies indicated a need for more uniform diagnostic and evaluation criteria, and larger trials would provide stronger evidence to better understand the effectiveness of the combined interventions. This trial is registered with trial registration number INPLASY202160090.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Risk of bias assessment of included trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial level data, effect estimates, and forest plot for the effects of combined interventions on the Stroop test (time).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trial level data, effect estimates, and forest plot for the effects of combined interventions on the Trail Making Test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Trial level data, effect estimates, and forest plot for the effects of combined interventions on the Forward Digit Span Test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benjamin E. J., Blaha M. J., Chiuve S. E., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation . 2017;135(10):E146–E603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feigin V. L. Anthology of stroke epidemiology in the 20th and 21st centuries: assessing the past, the present, and envisioning the future. International Journal of Stroke . 2019;14(3):223–237. doi: 10.1177/1747493019832996. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jaillard A., Naegele B., Trabucco-Miguel S., LeBas J. F., Hommel M. Hidden dysfunctioning in subacute stroke. Stroke . 2009;40(7):2473–2479. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541144. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cumming T. B., Marshall R. S., Lazar R. M. Stroke, cognitive deficits, and rehabilitation: still an incomplete picture. International Journal of Stroke . 2013;8(1):38–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00972.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jokinen H., Melkas S., Ylikoski R., et al. Post-stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery. European Journal of Neurology . 2015;22(9):1288–1294. doi: 10.1111/ene.12743. - DOI - PubMed