Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 16:16:100957.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100957. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Health inequality in Britain before 1750

Affiliations

Health inequality in Britain before 1750

Ellen J Kendall et al. SSM Popul Health. .

Abstract

Background: This study examines the claim that social inequality in health in European populations was absent prior to 1750. This claim is primarily based on comparisons of life expectancy at birth in England between general and ducal (elite aristocrat) social classes from the 1550s to the 1870s.

Methods: We examined historic childhood mortality trends among the English ducal class and the general population, based on previously published data. We compared mid-childhood to adolescent mortality (age 5-14) and early-childhood mortality (age 0-4) between the ducal class and the general population from the 17th to 19th centuries.

Results: Prior to 1750, ducal early-childhood mortality was higher than the general population. However, mid-childhood to adolescent mortality was lower among the ducal class than the general population in all observed periods for boys, and almost all periods for girls. Among the ducal class, but not the general population, there was a sharp decline in early-childhood mortality around the 1750s which may partly explain the divergent trends in overall life expectancy at birth.

Conclusion: Health inequality between the ducal class and general population was present in England from the 16th to mid-18th centuries, with disadvantages in mortality for ducal children in infancy and early childhood, but survival advantages in mid-childhood and adolescence. These opposing effects are obscured in life expectancy at birth data. Relatively high early-childhood mortality among ducal families before 1750 likely resulted from short birth intervals and harmful infant feeding practices during this time.

Keywords: Childhood mortality; Early modern England; Historical demography; Life expectancy; Social inequality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Life expectancy at birth (e0) from the 1550s–1870s, comparing ducal males and females (data from Hollingsworth (1977), Table 3, p. 328) with the general population of England (data from Wrigley et al. (1997), Table A9.1, p. 614).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Ducal life expectancy at birth and child mortality (deaths under 5 years) from the 14th-19th centuries by sex (life expectancy data from Hollingsworth (1957), p.8; data for deaths under 5 years from ibid, p. 9; the unevenly spaced cohort intervals are original to the Hollingsworth data).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Under-5 mortality (0–4 years) risk from the 17th-19th centuries, for ducal and wider English population by sex (data for ducal deaths from Hollingsworth (1964), p.54-55; data for English children calculated from 1q0 and 4q1 in Wrigley et al. (1997), p. 296 using WHO method for CME (2013)).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Infant (top panel) and child mortality (bottom panel) risk for ducal and wider English population by sex from the 17th-19th centuries (data for ducal deaths from Hollingsworth (1977), p.327; data for English children in Wrigley et al. (1997), p. 296).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Probability of dying in childhood between the ages of 5 and 14 years during the 17th and 18th centuries for males (top panel) and females (bottom panel) in ducal (T. Hollingsworth, 1964, pp. 54–55) and English children (English data calculated from 5q5 and 5q10 in Wrigley et al. (1997), p. 296 using WHO method for CME (2013)).

Similar articles

Cited by

  • History lessons for tackling inequalities in health.
    Whitehead M, Burström B. Whitehead M, et al. SSM Popul Health. 2021 Nov 25;16:100980. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100980. eCollection 2021 Dec. SSM Popul Health. 2021. PMID: 34888411 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Aburto J.M., Villavicencio F., Basellini U., Kjærgaard S., Vaupel J.W. Dynamics of life expectancy and life span equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020;117(10):5250–5259. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almond D., Currie J., Duque V. Childhood circumstances and adult outcomes: Act II. Journal of Economic Literature. 2018;56(4):1360–1446.
    1. Antonovsky A. Social class, life expectancy and overall mortality. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. 1967;45:31–73. - PubMed
    1. Barker D.J. Developmental origins of chronic disease. Public Health. 2012;126(3):185–189. - PubMed
    1. Cash-Gibson L., Pericàs J.M., Martinez-Herrera E., Benach J. Health inequalities in the time of COVID-19: The globally reinforcing need to strengthen health inequalities research capacities. International Journal of Health Services. 2021;51(3):300–304. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources