Including the Reason for Use on Prescriptions Sent to Pharmacists: Scoping Review
- PMID: 34842545
- PMCID: PMC8663503
- DOI: 10.2196/22325
Including the Reason for Use on Prescriptions Sent to Pharmacists: Scoping Review
Abstract
Background: In North America, although pharmacists are obligated to ensure prescribed medications are appropriate, information about a patient's reason for use is not a required component of a legal prescription. The benefits of prescribers including the reason for use on prescriptions is evident in the current literature. However, it is not standard practice to share this information with pharmacists.
Objective: Our aim was to characterize the research on how including the reason for use on a prescription impacts pharmacists.
Methods: We performed an interdisciplinary scoping review, searching literature in the fields of health care, informatics, and engineering. The following databases were searched between December 2018 and January 2019: PubMed, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), and EMBASE.
Results: A total of 3912 potentially relevant articles were identified, with 9 papers meeting the inclusion criteria. The studies used different terminology (eg, indication, reason for use) and a wide variety of study methodologies, including prospective and retrospective observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and qualitative interviews and focus groups. The results suggest that including the reason for use on a prescription can help the pharmacist catch more errors, reduce the need to contact prescribers, support patient counseling, impact communication, and improve patient safety. Reasons that may prevent prescribers from adding the reason for use information are concerns about workflow and patient privacy.
Conclusions: More research is needed to understand how the reason for use information should be provided to pharmacists. In the limited literature to date, there is a consensus that the addition of this information to prescriptions benefits patient safety and enables pharmacists to be more effective. Future research should use an implementation science or theory-based approach to improve prescriber buy-in and, consequently, adoption.
Keywords: human factors; multidisciplinary; patient engagement; patient safety.
©Kathryn Mercer, Caitlin Carter, Catherine Burns, Ryan Tennant, Lisa Guirguis, Kelly Grindrod. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 25.11.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Garada M, McLachlan AJ, Schiff GD, Lehnbom EC. What do Australian consumers, pharmacists and prescribers think about documenting indications on prescriptions and dispensed medicines labels?: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2704-3. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-017-2... 10.1186/s12913-017-2704-3 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Warholak-Juarez T, Rupp MT, Salazar TA, Foster S. Effect of patient information on the quality of pharmacists' drug use review decisions. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 2000;40(4):500–8. - PubMed
-
- Mercer K, Burns C, Guirguis L, Chin J, Dogba MJ, Dolovich L, Guénette Line, Jenkins L, Légaré France, McKinnon A, McMurray J, Waked K, Grindrod KA. Physician and Pharmacist Medication Decision-Making in the Time of Electronic Health Records: Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Sep 25;5(3):e24. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9891. https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2018/3/e24/ v5i3e24 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
