Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;64(3):503-512.
doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02852-2. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

Incidental findings on 3 T neuroimaging: cross-sectional observations from the population-based Rhineland Study

Valerie Lohner  1 , Ran Lu  1 , Simon J Enkirch  2 , Tony Stöcker  3   4 , Elke Hattingen  2   5 , Monique M B Breteler  6   7
Affiliations

Incidental findings on 3 T neuroimaging: cross-sectional observations from the population-based Rhineland Study

Valerie Lohner et al. Neuroradiology. 2022 Mar.

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: Development of best practices for dealing with incidental findings on neuroimaging requires insight in their frequency and clinical relevance.

Methods: Here, we delineate prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals and clinical management of incidental findings, based on the first 3589 participants of the population-based Rhineland Study (age range 30-95 years) who underwent 3 Tesla structural neuroimaging (3D, 0.8 mm3 isotropic resolution). Two trained raters independently assessed all scans for abnormalities, with confirmation and adjudication where needed by neuroradiologists. Participants were referred for diagnostic work-up depending on the potential benefit.

Results: Of 3589 participants (mean age 55 ± 14 years, 2072 women), 867 had at least one possible incidental finding (24.2%). Most common were pituitary abnormalities (12.3%), arachnoid cysts (4.1%), developmental venous anomalies (2.5%), non-acute infarcts (1.8%), cavernomas (1.0%), and meningiomas (0.7%). Forty-six participants were informed about their findings, which was hitherto unknown in 40 of them (1.1%). Of these, in 19 participants (48%), a wait-and-see policy was applied and nine (23%) received treatment, while lesions in the remainder were benign, could not be confirmed, or the participant refused to inform us about their clinical diagnosis.

Conclusion: Nearly one-quarter of participants had an incidental finding, but only 5% of those required referral, that mostly remained without direct clinical consequences.

Keywords: Incidental findings; MRI; Neuroimaging; Observational study; Population-based study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart showing inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. Body shape indicates participants who did not fit into the MRI scanner
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Workflow assessment of incidental findings in the Rhineland Study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA, Kahn JP, Cho MK, Clayton EW, Fletcher JG, Georgieff MK, Hammerschmidt D, Hudson K, Illes J, Kapur V, Keane MA, Koenig BA, Leroy BS, McFarland EG, Paradise J, Parker LS, Terry SF, Van Ness B, Wilfond BS (2008) Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 36(2):219–48, 11. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00266.x - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orme NM, Fletcher JG, Siddiki HA, Harmsen WS, O’Byrne MM, Port JD, Tremaine WJ, Pitot HC, McFarland EG, Robinson ME, Koenig BA, King BF, Wolf SM. Incidental findings in imaging research: evaluating incidence, benefit, and burden. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(17):1525–1532. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.317. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJ, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Niessen WJ, Breteler MM, van der Lugt A. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1821–1828. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070972. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandeman EM, Hernandez Mdel C, Morris Z, Bastin ME, Murray C, Gow AJ, Corley J, Henderson R, Deary IJ, Starr JM, Wardlaw JM. Incidental findings on brain MR imaging in older community-dwelling subjects are common but serious medical consequences are rare: a cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e71467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bos D, Poels MM, Adams HH, Akoudad S, Cremers LG, Zonneveld HI, Hoogendam YY, Verhaaren BF, Verlinden VJ, Verbruggen JG, Peymani A, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Vincent AJ, Feelders RA, Koudstaal PJ, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA, Vernooij MW. Prevalence, clinical management, and natural course of incidental findings on brain MR images: the population-based Rotterdam Scan Study. Radiology. 2016;281(2):507–515. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160218. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources