Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec;30(6):1149-1159.
doi: 10.1177/17085381211045183. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

A review of through-knee amputation

Affiliations
Review

A review of through-knee amputation

Brieuc Panhelleux et al. Vascular. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Through-knee amputation is an umbrella term for several different surgical techniques, which may affect clinical and functional outcomes. This makes it hard to evaluate the benefits and need for a through-knee amputation approach. This article seeks to (1) determine the number of through-knee amputation performed compared with other major lower limb amputations in England over the past decade; (2) identify the theoretical concepts behind through-knee amputation surgical approaches and their potential effect on functional and clinical outcomes and (3) provide a platform for discussion and research on through-knee amputation and surgical outcomes.

Methods: National Health Service Hospital Episodes Statistics were used to obtain recent numbers of major lower limb amputations in England. EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched using a systematic approach with predefined criteria for relevant literature on through-knee amputation surgery.

Results: In the past decade, 4.6% of major lower limb amputations in England were through-knee amputations. Twenty-six articles presenting through-knee amputation surgical techniques met our criteria. These articles detailed three through-knee amputation surgical techniques: the classical approach, which keeps the femur intact and retains the patella; the Mazet technique, which shaves the femoral condyles into a box shape and the Gritti-Stokes technique, which divides the femur proximal to the level of the condyles and attaches the patella at the distal cut femur.

Conclusions: Through-knee amputation has persisted as a surgical approach over the past decade, with three core approaches identified. Studies reporting clinical, functional and biomechanical outcomes of through-knee amputation frequently fail to distinguish between the three distinct and differing approaches, making direct comparisons difficult. Future studies that compare through-knee amputation approaches to one another and to other amputation levels are needed.

Keywords: Amputee; Gritti-Stokes; Mazet; knee disarticulation; surgical technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the residual limb after through-knee amputation following different techniques. (a) Classical approach: the patella is preserved, and the patellar tendon is attached to the cruciate ligaments. (b) Mazet technique: the femoral condyles are shaved, the patella is removed and the quadriceps tendon is attached to the cruciate ligaments. (c) Gritti-Stokes technique: the femur is divided transversally, and the patella is attached at the distal cut end of the femur.
Figure A1.
Figure A1.
Number of articles presenting through-knee amputation (TKA) surgical techniques or modifications per decade. Articles not in English or French are included in this total (n = 10) but were not included in the subsequent review. Articles before 1940 were identified through reference screening of identified studies techniques to be included in the review.

References

    1. Krueger CA, Wenke JC, Ficke JR. Ten years at war: comprehensive analysis of amputation trends. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73: S438–S444. - PubMed
    1. Pasquina PF, Miller M, Carvalho AJ, et al. Special considerations for multiple limb amputation. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2014; 2: 273–289. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith D. The knee disarticulation: it’s better when it’s better and it’s not when it’s not. InMotion 2004; 14: 56–62.
    1. Baumgartner RF. Failures in through-knee amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983; 7: 116–118. - PubMed
    1. Murakami T, Murray K. Outcomes of knee disarticulation and the influence of surgical techniques in dysvascular patients: a systematic review. Prosthet Orthot Int 2016; 40: 423–435. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources