Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 29;22(1):996.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04849-7.

Fracture profiles of a 4-year cohort of 266,324 first incident upper extremity fractures from population health data in Ontario

Affiliations

Fracture profiles of a 4-year cohort of 266,324 first incident upper extremity fractures from population health data in Ontario

Joy C MacDermid et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Understanding the profiles of different upper extremity fractures, particularly those presenting as a 1st incident can inform prevention and management strategies. The purpose of this population-level study was to describe first incident fractures of the upper extremity in terms of fracture characteristics and demographics.

Methods: Cases with a first adult upper extremity (UE) fracture from the years 2013 to 2017 were extracted from administrative data in Ontario. Fracture locations (ICD-10 codes) and associated characteristics (open/closed, associated hospitalization within 1-day, associated nerve, or tendon injury) were described by fracture type, age category and sex. Standardized mean differences of at least 10% (clinical significance) and statistical significance (p < 0.01) in ANOVA were used to identify group differences (age/sex).

Results: We identified 266,324 first incident UE fractures occurring over 4 years. The most commonly affected regions were the hand (93 K), wrist/forearm(80 K), shoulder (48 K) or elbow (35 K). The highest number of specific fractures were: distal radius (DRF, 47.4 K), metacarpal (30.4 K), phalangeal (29.9 K), distal phalangeal (24.4 K), proximal humerus (PHF, 21.7 K), clavicle (15.1 K), radial head (13.9 K), and scaphoid fractures (13.2 K). The most prevalent multiple fractures included: multiple radius and ulna fractures (11.8 K), fractures occurring in multiple regions of the upper extremity (8.7 K), or multiple regions in the forearm (8.4 K). Tendon (0.6% overall; 8.2% in multiple finger fractures) or nerve injuries were rarely reported (0.3% overall, 1.5% in distal humerus). Fractures were reported as being open in 4.7% of cases, most commonly for distal phalanx (23%). A similar proportion of females (51.5%) and males were present in this fracture cohort, but there were highly variant age-sex profiles across fracture subtypes. Fractures most common in 18-40-year-old males included metacarpal and finger fractures. Fractures common in older females were: DRF, PHF and radial head, which exhibited a dramatic increase in the over-50 age group.

Conclusions: UE fracture profiles vary widely by fracture type. Fracture specific prevention and management should consider fracture profiles that are highly variable according to age and sex.

Keywords: Comorbidity; Distal radius; Epidemiology; Fractures; Nerve injury; Proximal humerus; Scaphoid; Sex differences; Social deprivation; Tendon injury; Upper extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cohort diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of fractures by region by sex by age groups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of shoulder fractures by type, age and sex. Females=F, Males=M, Clavicle=Clav, Scapula=Scap, Proximal Humerus=PHF, Humerus Shaft=HumS, Humerus, Unspecified=HumU, Shoulder, Multiple=ShldM
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Number elbow region fractures by type, age and sex. Females=F, Males=M, Distal Humerus=DH, Olecranon=Olec,Coronoid=Cor, Monteggia=Mont,Radial Head=RHF
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Number of wrist fractures by type, age and sex. Females=F, Males=M, Multiple Radius and Ulna=M_R+U,Ulnar Shaft=UlnS,Radius Shaft=RadS,Ulna and Radial Shaft=Uln+RadS, Distal Radius=DRF, Forearm, Multiple=ForM, Scaphoid=Scapd, Carpal, Other=CarO,Hand & Wrist=H&W
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Number of hand fractures by type, age and sex. Females=F, Males=M, metacarpal 1=MC1,Metacarpal 2=MC2, Metacarpal, Multiple=MC_M, Proximal Phalanx=PP, Distal Phalanx=DP,Phalanx, Other=PhaO, Finger, Multiple=Fing_M

References

    1. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A. The burden of osteoporotic fractures: A method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:417–427. doi: 10.1007/s001980170112. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonafede M, Espindle D, Bower AG. The direct and indirect costs of long bone fractures in a working age US population. J Med Econ. 2013;16:169–178. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.737391. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmed LA, Schirmer ÆH, Jørgensen L, Størmer ÆJ, Joakimsen ÆRM. The gender- and age-specific 10-year and lifetime absolute fracture risk in Tromsø , Norway. 2009;:441–8. - PubMed
    1. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA, Berger M. Patients with Prior Fractures Have an Increased Risk of Future Fractures: A Summary of the Literature and Statistical Synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;15:721–739. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.721. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ootes D, Lambers KT, Ring DC. The epidemiology of upper extremity injuries presenting to the emergency department in the United States. Hand. 2012;7:18–22. doi: 10.1007/s11552-011-9383-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed