Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 30;25(4):451-455.
doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.4.451.

Paradigm shift for defining the resectability of pancreatic cancer

Affiliations
Review

Paradigm shift for defining the resectability of pancreatic cancer

Mee Joo Kang et al. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. .

Abstract

Supported by the expanding indications for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), the concept of resectability has evolved from being mostly based on the anatomical tumor extent to considering the biological and conditional factors relevant to prognosis. Therefore, it is more reasonable to define the "criteria for surgical resection" instead of using the "(technical) resectability criteria." NAT has been used in resectable PCs (RPC) with a high risk of early systemic recurrence, as predicted by various biological or anatomical markers. Moreover, the indications for NAT followed by conversion surgery or adjuvant surgery for borderline resectable or locally advanced PC (LAPC) are gradually expanding. Therefore, it is important to define the RPC group that will benefit from NAT and the LAPC group that will benefit from post-NAT surgery. At diagnosis, population-based approaches, such as prognostic stratification and staging systems and personalized outcome-based approaches using prognostic prediction models can be used to determine the criteria for treatment options. Standardized indications for conversion surgery are needed for patients who are initially treated with NAT. In addition to imaging-based morphological criteria, biological criteria, including CA19-9, and various metabolic criteria can be used to establish predicted outcome-based criteria. Multicenter collaboration is required to develop a large database with standardized data collection for various biomarkers and response data after NAT to establish more accurate outcome prediction models to define the new resectability criteria.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Neoadjuvant therapy; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic neoplasms; Patient selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Current issues related to expanding the indications for neoadjuvant treatment and surgery. BRPC, borderline resectable pancreatic cancer; C(R)T, chemo(radio) therapy; LAPC, locally advanced pancreatic cancer; NAT, neoadjuvant treatment; RPC, resectable pancreatic cancer.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Stratification of potentially resectable pancreatic cancer according to the biological characteristics and choice of therapy. NAT, neoadjuvant treatment.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Resectability determination using personalized prognosis prediction models. Preop., preoperative.

References

    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), author NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2 [Internet]. Plymouth Meeting: NCCN 2021. [cited 2021 Jun 5]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1455. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1455 .
    1. Ishido K, Hakamada K, Kimura N, Miura T, Wakiya T. Essential updates 2018/2019: current topics in the surgical treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020;5:7–23. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12379. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, Imrie C, Milicevic M, Sandberg AA, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) Surgery. 2014;155:977–988. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cady B. Basic principles in surgical oncology. Arch Surg. 1997;132:338–346. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430280012001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei AC, Raoul JL, et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2395–2406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809775. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources