Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;13(1):180-189.
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12860. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis is a useful indicator of muscle quality

Affiliations

Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis is a useful indicator of muscle quality

Yasunori Akamatsu et al. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Methods that facilitate muscle quality measurement may improve the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Current research has focused on the phase angle (PhA) obtained through bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) as an indicator of cellular health, particularly cell membrane integrity and cell function. The current study therefore aimed to evaluate the relationship between the PhA and muscle quality and muscle-related parameters and to determine factors associated with the PhA. Moreover, we attempted to determine the cut-off value of PhA for predicting sarcopenia.

Methods: First-year university students (830 male students, 18.5 ± 0.6 years old; 422 female students, 18.3 ± 0.5 years old) and community-dwelling elderly individuals (70 male individuals, 74.4 ± 5.5 years old; 97 female individuals, 73.1 ± 6.4 years old) were included. PhA and other body composition data were measured using BIA, while muscle quality was calculated by dividing handgrip strength by upper limbs muscle mass. The relationship between PhA and the aforementioned parameters were then analysed, after which the cut-off value of PhA for predicting sarcopenia was examined.

Results: Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age, skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), and muscle quality were independently associated with PhA in both sexes [male (age: standardized regression coefficient (β) = -0.43, P < 0.001, SMI: β = 0.61, P < 0.001, muscle quality: β = 0.13, P < 0.001) and female (age: β = -0.56, P < 0.001, SMI: β = 0.52, P < 0.001, muscle quality: β = 0.09, P = 0.007)]. Participants with sarcopenia had a significantly lower PhA compared with those without it (sarcopenia vs. non-sarcopenia: young male participants, 5.51 ± 0.41° vs. 6.25 ± 0.50°, P < 0.001; young female participants, 4.88 ± 0.16° vs. 5.37 ± 0.44°, P = 0.005; elderly female participants: 4.14 ± 0.29° vs. 4.63 ± 0.42°, P = 0.009). Although no significant findings were observed in elderly male participants, the same tendency was noted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that PhA had good predictive ability for sarcopenia in young male, elderly male, young female, and elderly female participants (area under the ROC curve of 0.882, 0.838, 0.865, and 0.850, with cut-off PhA values of 5.95°, 5.04°, 5.02°, and 4.20° for predicting sarcopenia, respectively).

Conclusions: The PhA reflected muscle quality and exhibited good accuracy in detecting sarcopenia, suggesting its utility as an index for easily measuring muscle quality, which could improve the diagnosis of sarcopenia.

Keywords: Bioelectrical impedance; Body composition; Muscle quality; Phase angle; Sarcopenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors of this manuscript declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow for participant registration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of PhA to detect sarcopenia in young male (A), elderly male (B), young female (C), and elderly female (D) participants.

References

    1. Santilli V, Bernetti A, Mangone M, Paoloni M. Clinical definition of sarcopenia. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2014;11:177–180. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shafiee G, Keshtkar A, Soltani A, Ahadi Z, Larijani B, Heshmat R. Prevalence of sarcopenia in the world: a systematic review and meta‐ analysis of general population studies. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2017;16:21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010;39:412–423. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019;48:16–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freilich RJ, Kirsner RL, Byrne E. Isometric strength and thickness relationships in human quadriceps muscle. Neuromuscul Disord 1995;5:415–422. - PubMed

Publication types