Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2021 Dec 1;47(12):1599.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000853.

Patient with dissociation of corneal topography and epithelial mapping

Affiliations
Case Reports

Patient with dissociation of corneal topography and epithelial mapping

Marcony R Santhiago. J Cataract Refract Surg. .

Abstract

A 21-year-old man was referred for refractive surgery evaluation. Spectacle dependence and poor visual quality in his left eye is his chief complaint. He cannot tolerate contact lenses (CLs). The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/20 in the right eye (-1.50 -2.00 × 180) and 20/30 in the left eye (-1.25 -1.50 × 170). The patient denied any history of ocular trauma, systemic disease, or medications. Corneal topography with different technologies revealed an inferior steepening in the left eye (Figure 1), whereas keratoconus indices from different strategies are within normal limits in both eyes (Supplemental Figures 1-4, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A496). Pachymetry maps from different devices present absolute values of thinnest point within normal ranges. Epithelial mapping revealed a localized thickening in the left eye (Supplemental Figures 5 and 6, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A496). Slitlamp showed a total clear cornea with no signs of abnormality. The patient presents no signs of blepharitis or dry-eye syndrome either. Intraocular pressure is 14 mm Hg in both eyes. The retina was normal, bilaterally. Considering the findings, what would be your main diagnostic hypothesis and, if any, which refractive surgery option would you consider for this patient?

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • December consultation #2.
    Schallhorn J. Schallhorn J. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Dec 1;47(12):1599. doi: 10.1097/01.j.jcrs.0000805112.77938.6c. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021. PMID: 34846338 No abstract available.
  • December consultation #3.
    De Stefano VS. De Stefano VS. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Dec 1;47(12):1600. doi: 10.1097/01.j.jcrs.0000805116.05909.44. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021. PMID: 34846339 No abstract available.
  • December consultation #4.
    Goggin M, Pesudovs K. Goggin M, et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Dec 1;47(12):1600-1601. doi: 10.1097/01.j.jcrs.0000805120.83568.3c. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021. PMID: 34846340 No abstract available.
  • December consultation #5.
    Mimouni M. Mimouni M. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Dec 1;47(12):1601-1602. doi: 10.1097/01.j.jcrs.0000805124.76974.4b. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021. PMID: 34846341 No abstract available.
  • December consultation #6.
    Mehta JS. Mehta JS. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Dec 1;47(12):1602. doi: 10.1097/01.j.jcrs.0000805128.00404.02. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021. PMID: 34846342 No abstract available.
  • December consultation #7.
    Shetty R, Khamar P. Shetty R, et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Dec 1;47(12):1602. doi: 10.1097/01.j.jcrs.0000805132.61324.01. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021. PMID: 34846343 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources