Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2136022.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36022.

Longitudinal Trajectories and Factors Associated With US County-Level Cardiovascular Mortality, 1980 to 2014

Affiliations

Longitudinal Trajectories and Factors Associated With US County-Level Cardiovascular Mortality, 1980 to 2014

Shreya Rao et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Cardiovascular (CV) mortality has declined for more than 3 decades in the US. However, differences in declines among residents at a US county level are not well characterized.

Objective: To identify unique county-level trajectories of CV mortality in the US during a 35-year study period and explore county-level factors that are associated with CV mortality trajectories.

Design, setting, and participants: This longitudinal cross-sectional analysis of CV mortality trends used data from 3133 US counties from 1980 to 2014. County-level demographic, socioeconomic, environmental, and health-related risk factors were compiled. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to September 2021.

Exposures: County-level characteristics, collected from 5 county-level data sets.

Main outcomes and measures: Cardiovascular mortality data were obtained for 3133 US counties from 1980 to 2014 using age-standardized county-level mortality rates from the Global Burden of Disease study. The longitudinal K-means approach was used to identify 3 distinct clusters based on underlying mortality trajectory. Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate associations between county characteristics and cluster membership.

Results: Among 3133 US counties (median, 49.5% [IQR, 48.9%-50.5%] men; 30.7% [IQR, 27.1%-34.4%] older than 55 years; 9.9% [IQR, 4.5%-22.7%] racial minority group [individuals self-identifying as Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, other, or multiple races/ethnicities]), CV mortality declined by 45.5% overall and by 38.4% in high-mortality strata (694 counties), by 45.0% in intermediate-mortality strata (1382 counties), and by 48.3% in low-mortality strata (1057 counties). Counties with the highest mortality in 1980 continued to demonstrate the highest mortality in 2014. Trajectory groups were regionally distributed, with high-mortality trajectory counties focused in the South and in portions of Appalachia. Low- vs high-mortality groups varied significantly in demographic (racial minority group proportion, 7.6% [IQR, 4.1%-14.5%]) vs 23.9% [IQR, 6.5%-40.8%]) and socioeconomic characteristics such as high-school education (9.4% [IQR, 7.3%-12.6%] vs 20.1% [IQR, 16.1%-23.2%]), poverty rates (11.4% [IQR, 8.8%-14.6%] vs 20.6% [IQR, 17.1%-24.4%]), and violent crime rates (161.5 [IQR, 89.0-262.4] vs 272.8 [IQR, 155.3-431.3] per 100 000 population). In multinomial logistic regression, a model incorporating demographic, socioeconomic, environmental, and health characteristics accounted for 60% of the variance in the CV mortality trajectory (R2 = 0.60). Sociodemographic factors such as racial minority group proportion (odds ratio [OR], 1.70 [95% CI, 1.35-2.14]) and educational attainment (OR, 6.17 [95% CI, 4.55-8.36]) and health behaviors such as smoking (OR for high vs low, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.58-2.64]) and physical inactivity (OR, 3.74 [95% CI, 2.83-4.93]) were associated with the high-mortality trajectory.

Conclusions and relevance: Cardiovascular mortality declined in all subgroups during the 35-year study period; however, disparities remained unchanged during that time. Disparate trajectories were associated with social and behavioral risks. Health policy efforts across multiple domains, including structural and public health targets, may be needed to reduce existing county-level cardiovascular mortality disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Hughes reported receiving grants from the Texas Health Resources Clinical Scholars Program during the conduct of the study. Mr Ayers reported receiving statistical consulting fees from the National Institutes of Health outside the submitted work. Dr Pandey reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging, Gilead Sciences, Inc, and Applied Therapeutics, Inc, during the conduct of the study and nonfinancial support from the Roche Diagnostics advisory board, Pfizer, and Merck & Co, Inc, outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Cardiovascular (CV) Mortality Trajectory by Cluster, 1980 to 2014
Declines in CV mortality were observed in all clusters with the differences in absolute mortality rate between high- and low-mortality clusters unchanged during the 35-year study period. Mortality rates are reported as medians.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Choropleths Depicting Regional Patterns of Mortality and Distress
A, Choropleth depicting regional distribution of cluster membership, with the highest-mortality counties clustered in the Deep South and Appalachia and the lowest-mortality counties clustered predominantly in the Northwestern, Western, and Midwestern US. B, Choropleth demonstrating the proportion of counties with greater than 80% population in distressed zip codes (highest distress), 20% to 80% population in distressed zip codes (intermediate distress), and less than 20% population in distressed zip codes (lowest distress). Substantial regional overlap is observed between counties with a high proportion of the population living in distressed zip codes and the high-mortality cluster.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Proportion of Counties Qualified as Prosperous, Intermediate Distress, or Distressed by Mortality Cluster
Socioeconomic distress is based on aggregate distress scores across 7 individual metrics in the Distressed Communities Index (DCI) and grouped into quintiles ranging from prosperous counties to distressed counties, with low distress scores indicating the least distressed counties. The intermediate distress category is composed of the 3 intermediate categories (comfortable, midtier, and at-risk) in the DCI. The proportion of prosperous counties declined from the low- to high-mortality clusters, whereas the proportion of distressed counties increased from the low- to high-mortality clusters. More than half of high-mortality counties qualified as distressed based on distress score.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dalen JE, Alpert JS, Goldberg RJ, Weinstein RS. The epidemic of the 20(th) century: coronary heart disease. Am J Med. 2014;127(9):807-812. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.04.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, et al. . Explaining the decrease in US deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(23):2388-2398. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa053935 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wright JS, Wall HK, Ritchey MD. Million Hearts 2022: small steps are needed for cardiovascular disease prevention. JAMA. 2018;320(18):1857-1858. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13326 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Havranek EP, Mujahid MS, Barr DA, et al. ; American Heart Association Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health, and Stroke Council . Social determinants of risk and outcomes for cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132(9):873-898. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000228 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roth GA, Johnson CO, Abate KH, et al. ; Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Collaboration . The burden of cardiovascular diseases among US states, 1990-2016. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(5):375-389. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0385 - DOI - PMC - PubMed