The effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy: a propensity score-matched study
- PMID: 34846571
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06347-6
The effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy: a propensity score-matched study
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).
Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted using the hospital records of all women diagnosed with CSP during a period of 6 years, between January 2014 and December 2019, at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. The clinical characteristics and different treatment modalities were analyzed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 181 patients with reproductive needs were selected and divided into a UAE group (n = 51) and a non-UAE group (n = 130) according to whether they received preventive UAE before their hysteroscopic or laparoscopic operation. The basic characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of patients in each group were compared, and a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to produce 37 matched pairs.
Results: Before PSM, the UAE group had a thinner muscle layer, larger mass size, and higher serum human chorionic gonadotropin level than the non-UAE group. The pregnancy rate and live birth rate of the UAE group were 54.9% and 61.9%, respectively, which were lower than those of the non-UAE group (61.5% and 66.7%), but no statistical differences were observed. Post-PSM, no significant differences between basic characteristics of the groups were observed. The pregnancy rate of the UAE group was 51.4%, which was lower than that of the non-UAE group (73.0%); the live birth rate of the UAE group was 64.3%, which was also lower than that of the non-UAE group (72.7%); however, the differences were not statistically significant with the P value of 0.077 and 0.716.
Conclusion: Prophylactic UAE did not induce a significant difference in pregnancy rate and live birth rate between the UAE group and the non-UAE group.
Keywords: Cesarean scar pregnancy; Fertility; Uterine artery embolization.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
[Clinical analysis on hysteroscopic surgery for the treatment of type Ⅱ cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 25;52(10):669-674. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.10.005. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 29060964 Chinese.
-
[Clinical analysis on selective uterine artery embolization combined with hysteroscopic surgery for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy in 67 cases].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;50(8):576-81. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 26675179 Chinese.
-
Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):883-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 8. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30205163
-
Clinical efficacy and safety between high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jun;10(6):6379-6387. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-839. Ann Palliat Med. 2021. PMID: 34237960
-
Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Jun;30(6):446-454. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Mar 7. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36893898 Review.
Cited by
-
Pregnancy rate and outcomes after uterine artery embolization for women: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 21;10:1283279. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1283279. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 38179282 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical investigation of fertility after uterine artery embolization combined with dilation and curettage(D&C) or D&C alone for cesarean scar pregnancies.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025 Mar 18;26:100379. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100379. eCollection 2025 Jun. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025. PMID: 40206394 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Osborn DA, Williams TR, Craig BM (2012) Cesarean scar pregnancy: sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, and treatment. J Ultrasound Med 31(9):1449–1456. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.9.1449 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wang S, Li Y, Ma X (2020) Lower uterine segment thickness in assessing whether cesarean scar pregnancy patients could be treated with suction curettage. The J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 33(19):3332–3337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1531118 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hoffman T, Lin J (2020) Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis with ultrasound. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med 4(1):65–68. https://doi.org/10.5811/cpcem.2019.10.43988 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Fylstra D (2002) Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstetr Gynecol Survey 57(8):537–543. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200208000-00024 - DOI
-
- Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P (2000) Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol 16(6):592–593. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00300-2.x - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous