Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;24(5):530-538.
doi: 10.1111/bdi.13166. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

Which mixed depression model? A comparison between DSM-5-defined mixed features and Koukopoulos' criteria

Ludovico Mineo  1 , Alessandro Rodolico  1 , Giorgio A Spedicato  2 , Andrea Aguglia  3   4 , Simone Bolognesi  5 , Carmen Concerto  1 , Alessandro Cuomo  5 , Arianna Goracci  5 , Gianluca Serafini  3   4 , Giuseppe Maina  6 , Andrea Fagiolini  5 , Mario Amore  3   4 , Eugenio Aguglia  1
Affiliations

Which mixed depression model? A comparison between DSM-5-defined mixed features and Koukopoulos' criteria

Ludovico Mineo et al. Bipolar Disord. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition "with mixed features specifier" (DSM-5 MFS) are considered controversial since they include only typical manic symptoms. By contrast, Koukopoulos developed an alternative model of mixed depression (MxD) focusing primarily on the excitatory component.

Objective: To compare DSM-5 MFS and Koukopoulos' MxD (KMxD) in terms of prevalence, associated clinical variables, and discriminative capacity for bipolar depression in patients with major depressive episode (MDE).

Methods: A total of 300 patients with MDE-155 with major depressive disorder and 145 with bipolar disorder (BD)-were recruited. The discriminative capacity of DSM-5 MFS and KMxD criteria for BD was estimated using the area under the curves of receiver operating characteristic (ROC_AUC). The clinical variables associated with these two diagnostic constructs were assessed by performing a logistic regression.

Results: A total of 44 and 165 patients met the DSM-5 MFS and KMxD criteria, respectively. The ROC_AUCs and their confidence intervals for BD according to DSM-5 MFS and KMxD were 77.0% (72.0%-82.1%) and 71.9% (66.2%-77.7%), respectively. The optimal thresholds (combining sensitivity and specificity measures) for BD diagnosis were ≥1 (77%/68%) for DSM-5 MFS and ≥3 symptoms (78%/66%) for KMxD. However, considering the DSM-5 MFS cut-off (≥3 symptoms), the specificity (97%) increased at the expense of sensitivity (26%).

Conclusions: KMxD and DSM-5-MFS showed an overlapping discriminative capacity for bipolar depression. The current diagnostic threshold of DSM-5 MFS did not prove to be very inclusive, if compared with the greater diagnostic sensitivity of KMxD, which also yielded better association with clinical variables related to mixedness.

Keywords: Elastic Net; bipolar; depression; generalized linear model; mixed features; mood disorders; receiver operating characteristic curve; sensitivity; specificity; unipolar.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Stahl SM, Morrissette DA, Faedda G, et al. Guidelines for the recognition and management of mixed depression. CNS Spectr. 2017;22:203-219.
    1. Malhi GS, Bell E. Mixed states: an early warning sign of profound problems in our taxonomy? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019;139(6):489-492. doi:10.1111/acps.13037
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (text rev). 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
    1. Vieta E, Valenti M. Mixed states in DSM-5: implications for clinical care, education, and research. J Affect Disord. 2013;148(1):28-36. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.007

Publication types

MeSH terms