Values in Psychometrics
- PMID: 34846952
- PMCID: PMC9069645
- DOI: 10.1177/17456916211014183
Values in Psychometrics
Abstract
When it originated in the late 19th century, psychometrics was a field with both a scientific and a social mission: Psychometrics provided new methods for research into individual differences and at the same time considered these methods a means of creating a new social order. In contrast, contemporary psychometrics-because of its highly technical nature and its limited involvement in substantive psychological research-has created the impression of being a value-free discipline. In this article, we develop a contrasting characterization of contemporary psychometrics as a value-laden discipline. We expose four such values: that individual differences are quantitative (rather than qualitative), that measurement should be objective in a specific sense, that test items should be fair, and that the utility of a model is more important than its truth. Our goal is not to criticize psychometrics for supporting these values but rather to bring them into the open and to show that they are not inevitable and are in need of systematic evaluation.
Keywords: fair test; objectivity; psychometrics; quantification; utility; validity; value-free ideal; values.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Alexandrova A., Haybron D. M. (2016). Is construct validation valid? Philosophy of Science, 83, 1098–1109.
-
- Anderson E. (2004). Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce. Hypatia, 19, 1–24.
-
- Au W. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30, 39–62.
-
- Batchelder W. H. (2010). Mathematical psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 759–765. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources