Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 1;19(1):318.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02190-3.

Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review

Nuru Saadi et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: How best to prioritise COVID-19 vaccination within and between countries has been a public health and an ethical challenge for decision-makers globally. We reviewed epidemiological and economic modelling evidence on population priority groups to minimise COVID-19 mortality, transmission, and morbidity outcomes.

Methods: We searched the National Institute of Health iSearch COVID-19 Portfolio (a database of peer-reviewed and pre-print articles), Econlit, the Centre for Economic Policy Research, and the National Bureau of Economic Research for mathematical modelling studies evaluating the impact of prioritising COVID-19 vaccination to population target groups. The first search was conducted on March 3, 2021, and an updated search on the LMIC literature was conducted from March 3, 2021, to September 24, 2021. We narratively synthesised the main study conclusions on prioritisation and the conditions under which the conclusions changed.

Results: The initial search identified 1820 studies and 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The updated search on LMIC literature identified 7 more studies. 43 studies in total were narratively synthesised. 74% of studies described outcomes in high-income countries (single and multi-country). We found that for countries seeking to minimise deaths, prioritising vaccination of senior adults was the optimal strategy and for countries seeking to minimise cases the young were prioritised. There were several exceptions to the main conclusion, notably that reductions in deaths could be increased if groups at high risk of both transmission and death could be further identified. Findings were also sensitive to the level of vaccine coverage.

Conclusion: The evidence supports WHO SAGE recommendations on COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation. There is, however, an evidence gap on optimal prioritisation for low- and middle-income countries, studies that included an economic evaluation, and studies that explore prioritisation strategies if the aim is to reduce overall health burden including morbidity.

Keywords: COVID-19, Vaccination, Mathematical modelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
WHO SAGE vaccine prioritisation recommendations under different supply scenarios during community transmission (adapted from the WHO sage roadmap for prioritising uses of COVID-19 vaccines in the context of limited supply)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection for the search conducted in March 2021 and in September 2021. HIC high-income country

References

    1. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 20 Sept 2021.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO SAGE values framework for the allocation and prioritization of COVID-19 vaccination. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/whosage- values-framework-for-th.... Accessed 8 June 2021.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization Working Group on COVID-19 Vaccines: Prioritized Infectious Disease and Economic Modelling Questions. https://www.who.int/immunization/policy/sage/SAGE_WG_COVID19_Vaccines_Mo.... Accessed 8 June 2021.
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Pettricrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M et al. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster-university/contentassets/ do.... Accessed 8 June 2021.

Publication types

Substances