Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 23:14:3225-3231.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S340786. eCollection 2021.

Saudi Radiology Personnel's Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Implementation: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Saudi Radiology Personnel's Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Implementation: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abdulaziz A Qurashi et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. .

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology has been a subject of heated debate. The external perception is that algorithms and machines cannot offer better diagnosis than radiologists. Reluctance to implement AI maybe due to the opacity in how AI applications work and the challenging and lengthy validation process. In this study, Saudi radiology personnel's familiarity with AI applications and its usefulness in clinical practice were investigated.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia among radiology personnel from March to April 2021. Radiology personnel nationwide were surveyed electronically using Google form. The questionnaire included 12-questions related to AI usefulness in clinical practice and participants' knowledge about AI and their acceptance level to learn and implement this technology into clinical practice. Participants' trust level was also measured; Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine differences between groups.

Results: A total of 224 respondents from various radiology-related occupations participated in the survey. The lowest trust level in AI applications was shown by radiologists (p = 0.033). Eighty-two percent of participants (n = 184) had never used AI in their departments. Most respondents (n = 160, 71.4%) reported lack of formal education regarding AI-based applications. Most participants (n = 214, 95.5%) showed strong interest in AI education and are willing to incorporate it into the clinical practice of radiology. Almost half of radiography students (22/46, 47.8%) believe that their job might be at risk due to AI application (p = 0.038).

Conclusion: Radiology personnel's knowledge of AI has a significant impact on their willingness to learn, use and adapt this technology in clinical practice. Participants demonstrated a positive attitude towards AI, showed a reasonable understanding and are highly motivated to learn and incorporate it into clinical practice. Some participants felt that their jobs were threatened by AI adaptation, but this belief might change with good training and education programmes.

Keywords: AI-based applications; artificial intelligence; imaging modalities; radiologists; radiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Demographic profile of the study participants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee LI, Kanthasamy S, Ayyalaraju RS, Ganatra R. The current state of artificial intelligence in medical imaging and nuclear medicine. BJR Open. 2019;1:20190037. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology UK Workforce Census 2015 Report; 2016.
    1. Bin Dahmash A, Alabdulkareem M, Alfutais A, et al. Artificial intelligence in radiology: does it impact medical students preference for radiology as their future career? BJR Open. 2020;2:20200037. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Society of Radiology (ESR) communications@ myesr. org Emanuele Neri Nandita de Souza Adrian Brady Angel Alberich Bayarri Christoph D. Becker Francesca Coppola Jacob Visser. What the radiologist should know about artificial intelligence – an ESR white paper. Insights Imaging. 2019;10:1–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kohli M, Geis R. Ethics, artificial intelligence, and radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(9):1317–1319. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2018.05.020 - DOI - PubMed