Saudi Radiology Personnel's Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Implementation: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 34848967
- PMCID: PMC8627310
- DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S340786
Saudi Radiology Personnel's Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Implementation: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology has been a subject of heated debate. The external perception is that algorithms and machines cannot offer better diagnosis than radiologists. Reluctance to implement AI maybe due to the opacity in how AI applications work and the challenging and lengthy validation process. In this study, Saudi radiology personnel's familiarity with AI applications and its usefulness in clinical practice were investigated.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia among radiology personnel from March to April 2021. Radiology personnel nationwide were surveyed electronically using Google form. The questionnaire included 12-questions related to AI usefulness in clinical practice and participants' knowledge about AI and their acceptance level to learn and implement this technology into clinical practice. Participants' trust level was also measured; Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine differences between groups.
Results: A total of 224 respondents from various radiology-related occupations participated in the survey. The lowest trust level in AI applications was shown by radiologists (p = 0.033). Eighty-two percent of participants (n = 184) had never used AI in their departments. Most respondents (n = 160, 71.4%) reported lack of formal education regarding AI-based applications. Most participants (n = 214, 95.5%) showed strong interest in AI education and are willing to incorporate it into the clinical practice of radiology. Almost half of radiography students (22/46, 47.8%) believe that their job might be at risk due to AI application (p = 0.038).
Conclusion: Radiology personnel's knowledge of AI has a significant impact on their willingness to learn, use and adapt this technology in clinical practice. Participants demonstrated a positive attitude towards AI, showed a reasonable understanding and are highly motivated to learn and incorporate it into clinical practice. Some participants felt that their jobs were threatened by AI adaptation, but this belief might change with good training and education programmes.
Keywords: AI-based applications; artificial intelligence; imaging modalities; radiologists; radiology.
© 2021 Qurashi et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Artificial intelligence in radiology: Are Saudi residents ready, prepared, and knowledgeable?Saudi Med J. 2022 Jan;43(1):53-60. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.1.20210337. Saudi Med J. 2022. PMID: 35022284 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge, attitude, and perception of Arab medical students towards artificial intelligence in medicine and radiology: A multi-national cross-sectional study.Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul;34(7):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10509-2. Epub 2023 Dec 27. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38150076 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' Attitudes Toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence as a Diagnostic Tool in Radiology in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 7;11:e53108. doi: 10.2196/53108. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 39110973 Free PMC article.
-
Stakeholders' perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in radiology: a scoping review.Eur Radiol. 2022 Mar;32(3):1477-1495. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08214-z. Epub 2021 Sep 21. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34545445
-
Systematic Review of Radiology Residency Artificial Intelligence Curricula: Preparing Future Radiologists for the Artificial Intelligence Era.J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Jun;20(6):561-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.031. Epub 2023 Apr 29. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37127217
Cited by
-
Chinese colposcopists' attitudes toward the colposcopic artificial intelligence auxiliary diagnostic system (CAIADS): A nation-wide, multi-center survey.Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241279952. doi: 10.1177/20552076241279952. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39247091 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 31;9:990604. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.990604. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36117979 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: A systematic review.Health Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 12;6(3):e1138. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1138. eCollection 2023 Mar. Health Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36923372 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among doctors and medical students in Saudi Arabia.J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Apr;14(4):1459-1464. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1812_24. Epub 2025 Apr 25. J Family Med Prim Care. 2025. PMID: 40396072 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Awareness, Perceptions, and Opinions towards Artificial Intelligence among Healthcare Students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 24;59(5):828. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050828. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37241062 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology UK Workforce Census 2015 Report; 2016.
-
- European Society of Radiology (ESR) communications@ myesr. org Emanuele Neri Nandita de Souza Adrian Brady Angel Alberich Bayarri Christoph D. Becker Francesca Coppola Jacob Visser. What the radiologist should know about artificial intelligence – an ESR white paper. Insights Imaging. 2019;10:1–8. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous