Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 17:14:5275-5291.
doi: 10.2147/OTT.S283892. eCollection 2021.

Potential Biomarkers for the Efficacy of PD-1-PD-L Blockade in Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Potential Biomarkers for the Efficacy of PD-1-PD-L Blockade in Cancer

Miruna Grecea et al. Onco Targets Ther. .

Abstract

A decade ago, immune checkpoint blockade emerged as a major breakthrough in oncology, proposing a novel approach by which immune brakes could be released to enhance antitumor responses. Despite apparently modest improvement of the median duration of response, a spectacular doubling of long-term responses as compared to the available standard of care was seen, for instance, in metastatic melanoma. It soon became obvious that the percentage of patients responding to these novel approaches is relatively small, and the importance of an accurate prediction of responders became more and more clear. Strong predictive markers would allow for the administration of immune checkpoint blocker therapy to the patients most likely to benefit from it, and sparing the potential non-responders of a treatment which is far from innocuous, being associated with significant side-effects and, not least, an important price tag. A number of potential response predictors have already been investigated and partly validated, but they do not cover the major unmet need encountered in the current clinical setting. Here, we review biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade efficacy, either clinically validated and currently in use, or which have been proposed as candidates and are currently under investigation.

Keywords: PD-L1 expression; immune checkpoint blockade; microbiome; predictive biomarkers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Prof. Dr. Mihnea Zdrenghea received clinical study funding from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Amgen, non-financial support from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Servier and personal fees from Takeda during the conduct of the study. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Host-related biomarkers. Created by https://www.Biorender.com.

References

    1. Bretscher PA. The history of the two-signal model of lymphocyte activation: a personal perspective. Scand J Immunol. 2019;89(6):0–2. doi:10.1111/sji.12762 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang PW, Chang JWC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors win the 2018 Nobel Prize. Biomed J. 2019;42(5):299–306. doi:10.1016/j.bj.2019.09.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borcoman E, Kanjanapan Y, Champiat S, et al. Novel patterns of response under immunotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(3):385–396. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frelaut M, du Rusquec P, de Moura A, Le Tourneau C, Borcoman E. Pseudoprogression and hyperprogression as new forms of response to immunotherapy. BioDrugs. 2020;34(4):463–476. doi:10.1007/s40259-020-00425-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stephen Hodi F, Ballinger M, Lyons B, et al. Immune-modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (imrecist): refining guidelines to assess the clinical benefit of cancer immunotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(9):850–858. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.75.1644 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources